
[Sponsors] 
September 10, 2015, 06:11 
Regarding Laminar/Inviscid Flows

#1 
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 4 
If I want to simulate a very low turbulence problem, how should I know if I should select laminar or inviscid model in the fluid solver?
Thanks! 

September 10, 2015, 06:25 

#2  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,075
Rep Power: 35 
Quote:
Your question seems strange ... if you want to set a laminar model that's only for simulating turbulence in a DNS formulation. On the other hand, if you set inviscid flow you should be aware that you cannot simulate confined turbulence and you cannot perform a DNS. So, explain in details what you want to simulate 

September 10, 2015, 07:10 

#3  
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
I want to compare RANS results with an analytical model (which does not include any turbulence dissipation). so if i want to have CFD results that can be compared with my analytical model (which does not account for turbulence), how should I set my CFD model? invisicd or laminar? thanks! 

September 10, 2015, 07:25 

#4 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,075
Rep Power: 35 
Still not clear ...RANS provides a statistically averaged solution, what about the type of your analytical solution? I see you need for sure a viscous model


September 10, 2015, 08:17 

#5  
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
but i also want to check that when I select a invicid/laminar model in the fluid solver, the solution should equal or almost the same as the invisicid analytical model. making sense here? so my question is: whether i should choose a inviscid or laminar model in the fluid solver to compare to my inviscid analytical model. 

September 10, 2015, 08:30 

#6 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,075
Rep Power: 35 
honestly, I don't see the sense in making comparison between RANS and an inviscid model.... But without more details I can't say much more...
I suppose you should compare an Euler simulation and your inviscid analytical solution 

September 10, 2015, 08:47 

#7  
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
forget about the RANS part. I am trying to comparing between inviscid model to that from a fluid solver. so the question is what flow physics should I specify for the fluid solver: invisicid or laminar? 

September 10, 2015, 08:58 

#8 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,075
Rep Power: 35 
The Euler inviscid model


September 12, 2015, 00:46 

#9  
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 456
Rep Power: 11 
Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong. 

September 12, 2015, 16:42 

#10  
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
for my case, since I am trying to validate results between a inviscid analytical model to that from a fluid codesolver, i should be using prescribing a fluid with very low viscosity or in this case, the inviscid NS equations. thanks. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Derivation of the pressurecorrection equation for compressible flows  luftraudi  Main CFD Forum  0  July 17, 2012 06:35 
SIMPLE pressure correction in compressible flows  Maarten de Jong  Main CFD Forum  7  April 30, 2012 02:23 
y+ in high Pr flows  vishyaroon  Main CFD Forum  0  April 15, 2010 14:24 
Laminar SolidLiquid (Twophase flows) flows in CFX  freemankofi  ANSYS  0  April 8, 2010 16:59 
Free surface flows and multiphase flows  Vidar  Main CFD Forum  0  September 18, 2008 05:05 