CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

LES Filtering: how are the small and large scales equations solved?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree26Likes

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   August 20, 2012, 03:55
Default LES Filtering: how are the small and large scales equations solved?
  #1
Senior Member
 
atmcfd's Avatar
 
ATM
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 16
atmcfd is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have read many journals , which advocate implicit and explicit filtering.(Though implicit is almost always used). I'm yet to clearly understand how exactly the process of filtering works in the LES algorithm.This is my understanding of implicit filtering, Please correct it if I am wrong :

1) The LES governing equations containing the "filtered" terms and the subrid scale tensor \tau_{ij} are solved using some numerical scheme - e.g. SIMPLE.

2) The terms in the continuity and momentum equations - the velocity and pressure etc are solved for exactly the way normal Navier Stokes eqns are solved.i.e. Poisson;s eqn to solve for pressure, guessing the initial velocity field etc.

3) The subgrid tensor term is modeled using Smagorinsky or any other empirical model for EVERY cell in the mesh, where the LES equations are applied.i.e. the \tau_{ij} term is modeled in the equation for all mesh sizes, even when larger scales are being solved for.

---------------

So basically, is it that the LES governing equations are solved just like the traditional NS equations, but the difference being that an extra subgrid tensor has to be included in the equation every time, to include the effect of the smaller scales? So in essence, we can thus use a coarser mesh so that the LES eqns resolve the larger scales, and the subgrid term in the eqn, models the smaller scales, which are not able to be resolved due to the mesh not being fine enough? I was just wondering where the actual "filtering" process takes place in the code....is it just a mathematical definition which is used to derive the LES eqns?Coz' all I can see here are a modified form of the NS eqns and a subgrid term which is modeled.
Hence, I guess the solution algorithm for a LES code would be almost same as the traditional incompressible NS solver, except for the fact that I would have to compute \tau_{ij}, and include it in the main NS eqns.

As I said, kindly correct me wherever I am wrong here.

I have gone through almost all the older threads relating to this in the forum, but I couldn't get this cleared.I have to start writing a LES code myself, and hence i feel I have to be very strong in these concepts before I embark on it.

I know this has been a long question., and I would really appreciate anyone offering their help .

Thanks in advance.
hityangsir, wenxu, Moreza7 and 1 others like this.
atmcfd is offline   Reply With Quote

 

Tags
filter, les, navier stokes equation


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Y+ value for Large Eddy Simulation yannossss Main CFD Forum 15 March 21, 2017 23:41
Filtering in Large Eddy Simulation maybee Main CFD Forum 7 May 19, 2014 16:21
[ICEM] Large and small cylinder with inner wall Far ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 March 27, 2012 07:56
Simulating small features on large models siw CFX 1 February 16, 2012 17:10
what happens if y+ is too large or too small Bo Jensen Siemens 12 February 19, 2003 23:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:47.