|
[Sponsors] |
January 20, 2000, 04:02 |
Implementation of QUICK scheme
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hallo,
I am implementing a QUICK convection scheme into a 2d pressure-correction (SIMPLE-like) RANS code for non-orthogonal grids. The code in formulated in cartesian co-ordinates. The time discretisation is fully-implicit. I intend to scale-up the code to 3D later. 1) In the open literature I found the QUICK formulation for non-uniform grids, not for non-orthogonal and body-fitted grids. So firstly I implemted the scheme proposed for non-uniform but orthogonal grids. Is there an advice or a reference what could be done better with non-orthogonal grids? 2) I neglected the transverse curvature terms. Does someone know some references about the implementation of the QUICK scheme including the transverse curvature contribution and/or its performance for highly convective / turbulent flow? 3) I suppose that the scheme works equally for steady-state and transient solutions, if I use an implicit time discretisation. Am I right? What about an explicit time-marching scheme? I intend to implement an explicit pressure-correction scheme. Can I expect that I do not have to modify the interpolation scheme? Thanks a lot in advance! Romuald |
|
January 20, 2000, 05:16 |
Re: Implementation of QUICK scheme
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
You haven't chosen my favourite scheme (you'll have boundedness problems later!), but I think I can help: 1) QUICK for non-uniform grids in fine and you don't need to modify it any further. All 'curvilinear' or 'non-orthogonal' corrections are unnecessary - they will just increase your computational molecule but won't give you any additional accuracy. 2) You did fine - forget about curvature. 3) The scheme is fine. You'll have to under-relax the system for pressure correction (as does everybody else); this kind of stuff is well tested and publicised with both SIMPLE and PISO. The only trouble you can expect (to my knowledge is): a) boundaries need special treatment as there's no "far upwind" node. b) the scheme is unbounded, i.e. for a variable which is laways positive (e.g. T or k) you can get negative face values, which causes trouble. However, there's a bunch of NVD-modifications to QUICK (called SMART of SHARP, I'm not quite sure) - you will need those when you start convecting scalars c) QUICK is a real bitch to implement on unstructured meshes, as you loose the directions. But that's another subject..... Hrv |
|
January 20, 2000, 06:39 |
Re: Implementation of QUICK scheme
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you very much for your quite encouraging advice. Actually, I know about the boundedness problem and intend to implement the SMART scheme, which includes the QUICK scheme. May I ask what is your favourite scheme you mentioned, which does not seem to suffer from boundedness problems, even if no flux limiter is used?
Thanks Romuald |
|
January 20, 2000, 09:28 |
Re: Implementation of QUICK scheme
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Unfortunately, there's no linear scheme other than Upwind differencing that does not suffer from unboundedness, so I'm afraid that you'll always need a limiter. I have developed a scheme called Gamma (Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids,31:431-449, 1999) and it's been extensively tested on a lot of stuff, from combustion to two-phase and free surface flows. It is an NVD (limited!) scheme and its main advantages are i) it works on arbitrarily unstructured meshes (no need for "far upwind node") ii) compact support (blends UD and CD) iii) no time-step dependency and iv) (and most important) it's the simplest I could do! However, (I don't know the aim of your project), I think you made a decent choice, unless you ultimately want to make your code arbitrarily unstructured, so I think you can happily just QUICK away! Have fun, Hrv |
|
January 28, 2000, 20:43 |
Re: Implementation of QUICK scheme
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Dr.Hrvoje Jasak
You mentioned that you have tested your Gamma scheme on a lot of practical flow problems. How was accuracy of your Gamma scheme for practical flow calculations when compared with QUICK, SMART, HLPA or SOUCUP schemes ? Seok Ki Choi |
|
March 23, 2009, 00:18 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Prakash Ayappan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
||
March 23, 2009, 04:03 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Could you please send me your paper about your Gamma scheme, i can not find it. Regards |
||
March 23, 2009, 04:11 |
Your paper
|
#8 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi, if it's possible I would also like to get a copy of your paper about the GAMMA scheme. Could you e-mail it to me, if it's not a problem.
Thank you |
|
July 14, 2010, 16:10 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Mieszko Młody
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: POLAND, USA
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Dr HJ
You wrote that QUICK scheme is unbounded, but in OF-1.6 UserGuide in: Table 4.10: Behaviour of interpolation schemes used in divSchemes. It is written that QUICK is bounded. could you tell me which statment is correct ? Best, ZM |
|
August 3, 2010, 12:50 |
|
#10 |
Member
Nick Gardiner
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
There's a link to Prof.(!) Jasak's PhD at
http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/IcoFoam |
|
August 3, 2010, 13:23 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Mieszko Młody
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: POLAND, USA
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 17 |
Thank You !
It is really great works ! |
|
November 6, 2017, 22:20 |
|
#12 |
New Member
Francisco Angel
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 13 |
Quick author recommends quickest scheme for unsteady problems, see "a stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation" by B.P. Leonard.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind and QUICK scheme | Wiroon | Main CFD Forum | 19 | September 17, 2019 04:47 |
Upwind, central, QUICK scheme for Re~10000 | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 23, 2011 16:04 |
QUICK Scheme | mmahdinia | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | December 9, 2009 17:30 |
FEM Implementation of pressure-correction scheme | Markus | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 6, 2007 02:53 |
QUICK scheme | kim | FLUENT | 1 | August 29, 2002 11:16 |