|
[Sponsors] |
April 18, 2017, 08:24 |
Fourier number in fluid mechanics
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Agustín Villa
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Alcorcón
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello everyone,
recently I noticed about the use of the Fourier number for heat transfer, which is and it should be taken into account to set the proper time step when heat transfer is present. Have you ever used it? I have been told that it should be taken into account in natural convection, specially at low Prandtl number, it is, when your thermal diffusivity alpha increases. |
|
April 18, 2017, 11:50 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,769
Rep Power: 71 |
This number appears only after a space-time discretization (in your example 1D) is performed. It makes sense for the analysis of the numerical stability constraint when explicit schemes are used. For example, a first order in time and second order in space (FTCS) scheme leads to fix a typical stability value <=1/2.
|
|
April 25, 2017, 00:15 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,675
Rep Power: 66 |
Yes it should be considered & it's super important for heat diffusion dominated problems.
In transient conjugate heat transfer problems for example, the Fourier number can limit your time-step much more than your convective Courant number (because alpha in solids is large). |
|
April 25, 2017, 04:09 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Agustín Villa
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Alcorcón
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks for your answers. Most of the times, when I see this number, there is conjugate heat transfer. This number, should it be taken into account for single-phase heat transfer as well?
|
|
April 25, 2017, 04:52 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,769
Rep Power: 71 |
Quote:
Yes! Again, this number appears only after a numerical discretization of the parabolic heat transfer is introduced. The physics dictates the value of alpha but dt and dx are of numerical character. See Chap.2 http://mathcenter.hust.edu.cn/Upload...98740d59f8.pdf |
||
April 25, 2017, 20:37 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,675
Rep Power: 66 |
Yes, it should be! However, usually the diffusion time-scale is small compared to convective time-scale in a fluid. For example, your cell Peclet number is usually more than 1 (and that is why you use upwind schemes). So usually your Courant number is usually limiting and not the Fourier number. However, I don't really have a feel for Fo vs Pe vs Co in natural convection. You should check to make sure. You are also right, for low Prandtl numbers the Fourier number becomes more important.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays | Jeffzda | ParaView | 30 | November 6, 2023 21:00 |
Decomposing meshes | Tobi | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 22 | February 24, 2023 09:23 |
[Other] Can't Shake Erros: patch type 'patch' not constraint type 'empty' | BrendaEM | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | April 3, 2022 18:32 |
Compressor Simulation using rhoPimpleDyMFoam | Jetfire | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 107 | December 9, 2014 13:38 |
Stable boundaries | marcoymarc | CFX | 33 | March 13, 2013 06:39 |