CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

question of Volume of Solid-IBM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 18, 2017, 18:29
Default question of Volume of Solid-IBM
  #1
New Member
 
Aditya Kumar
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
aditya92in is on a distinguished road
Question answered, thanks

Last edited by aditya92in; May 18, 2017 at 12:33. Reason: question answered
aditya92in is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2017, 04:35
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,643
Rep Power: 41
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by aditya92in View Post
Hi all,

I am doing a masters thesis project on the Immersed Boundary Method. I plan to use the Volume of Solid IBM. To do this, my first test case is to achieve vortex shedding for a cylinder. I am coding a 2D-test case. I use the Fractional Step method, with AB-2 for momentum and diffusion, while, Central Differencing for spatial gradients. I use the Pressure Projection class of Fractional Step Methods, taken from Chorin. My professor had advised me against, using this. He had told me, to use the Pressure Correction, method as opposed to pressure projection, because, we push the velocity to make it divergence free in Pressure Correction, while we remove the divergent part of the velocity field in Pressure Projection, to make it divergence free. I don't understand this reason, very clearly. My understanding is that both do the same thing. Could somebody explain this ?

Thank you
Aditya

The NS system for incompressible flow requires that you get a final solution satisfying the constraint div v =0, no matter of the method you use. The differences between the two methods you cited are more in the nature of the numerical formulation. In particula, in the projection methods the velocity is projected onto the subspace of divergent-free functions so I do not understand the statement "while we remove the divergent part of the velocity field "
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
multiphaseEulerFoam high Courant number Frenk_T OpenFOAM 5 November 24, 2016 04:23
What is solid volume fraction correction equation Haiqin Main CFD Forum 1 June 22, 2016 01:22
multiphase turbulance case floating error harsha_kulkarni OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 February 18, 2016 06:06
mesh airfoil NACA0012 anand_30 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 December 12, 2011 05:16
Estimation of "inlet solid volume fraction"...? Genanry FLUENT 1 February 15, 2007 11:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:14.