|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Prandtl Mixing length Vs. Isotropic turbulent |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi:
Prandtl Mixing length hypthesis recommends that: u' ~= v' ~= l*du/dy throughout the whole flow field. The condition u' ~= v' is the definition of isotropic at a point. Now the question is: How prandtle mixing length hypothesis, which is the basis for all the zero equation models, can justify the anisotropicicty of turbulent colse to the wall? Thanks for your comments. MJ |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to define the turbulence intensity and mixing length at an outlet (for k-eps)? | david39 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | February 2, 2011 04:01 |
| k-epsilon: Defining turbulent intensity and length scale? | klausb | OpenFOAM | 0 | January 23, 2011 08:28 |
| how to calculate Turbulent Length Scale | nuimlabib | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 18, 2009 05:22 |
| Prandtl mixing length vs Isotropic assumption | Mohammad Kermani | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 26, 2000 16:47 |