
[Sponsors] 
December 17, 2018, 09:37 
Steady RANS on complex bluff body geometry

#1 
New Member
Tom Lauriks
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 
Is it possible that by using steady RANS, convergence for a turbulent flow around a complex bluff body geometry cannot be reached?
This statement was made by the COMSOL (the software that I use) support. However, they only showed me cases with laminar unsteady flow (flow around a cylinder and backward facing step), that did not reach convergence with a stationary solver, while my case is a turbulent flow. And I would expect that a turbulent solver will still find a steady solution, due to the ensemble averaging, which is in practice equal to time averaging, I think. I presume, however, that this depends on the time period over which the flow variables are averaged. For these reasons, my questions are: 1) Are the steady RANS Navier Stokes equations formulated such that, a specific time over which averaging is performed exists? If yes, how can I determine this time period? If not, why does URANS work? (Thus, why does the time averaging not average over the entire simulation period, and does the transient stadium exist?) 2) Is it indeed possible that for a turbulent flow, a stationary solver will not find a solution, if parts of the flow field are inherently unsteady? Or is this problem probably caused by another problem in my model (bad mesh quality, ....)? 

December 17, 2018, 10:18 

#2 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,198
Rep Power: 66 
Failing of convergence in solving the RANS equations is quite common. There is no theoretical reason to admit a lack of convergence when the flow has a statistically steady state. Often the problem is due to numerical issue and/or modelling issues


December 17, 2018, 11:25 

#3  
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,069
Rep Power: 60 
Quote:
Quote:
But of course bad numerics can also cause problems. 

December 17, 2018, 12:20 

#4 
New Member
Tom Lauriks
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 
Firstly, both Filippo Maria Denaro and Lucky Tran, thanks for your reply. I'm starting to understand my problem.
Secondly, about the following: Could you explain me how the finitetime average in URANS is determined? More specifically, how is the averaging time in URANS determined? (In addition, can the time averaging be different in the different time steps?) 

December 17, 2018, 13:17 

#5 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,198
Rep Power: 66 
The URANS equations have an implicit assumption about the type of time averaging. As a consequence, the difference in the meaning of the averaging is all contained in the turbulence model...This is somehow similar to the implicitbased LES approach, all the URANS/LES equations seems equal so that is the model that should distinguish the type of averaging. Of course, the numerics introduces a further confusion due to the builtin filter/average in the scheme


Tags 
bluff body, ensemble averaging, rans, steady and unsteady state 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Karman vortex  steady state solution with RANS ?  CellZone  Main CFD Forum  4  September 28, 2018 04:11 
Reducing drag on a bluff body using dimples  BBA  FLUENT  3  January 29, 2018 11:09 
[snappyHexMesh] Define faces of complex body as surface STLs forming a closed domain  Awak  OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion  1  April 12, 2016 22:46 
UDF for lift force on a bluff body  sawa  FLUENT  2  April 11, 2005 04:06 
How to associate geometry body and mesh  coriolius  CFX  1  November 3, 2004 17:20 