CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Improvements required for obtaining a good solution of 1D heat conduction equation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 7, 2020, 04:59
Default Improvements required for obtaining a good solution of 1D heat conduction equation
  #1
New Member
 
Durganshu
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Deeds is on a distinguished road
Hello all!

I have been solving a one-dimensional heat conduction equation of quenching phenomena (along the axial direction) on MATLAB. I have discretized the governing equation using the FDM scheme(implicit) and solved using TDMA algorithm. The equation is subject to some initial and boundary conditions and the temperature of the rod is cooled from 573K to 303K (B.C at n=1: 303K and B.C. at n=6000: 573K). The rod domain consists of 6000 nodes (uniform mesh).

In the considered problem, the quench front or the wet front is propagating at a certain quench velocity and each curve(varying colours) shows the temperature profile of the rod as the quench front propagates in the increasing direction of axial length (downwards along the length of rod). Thus, temperature plotted is a function of time and axial length (and heat transfer coefficient, as the governing equation consists of the 'h' and its variation is shown in subplot no. 2). The position of the quench front changes with each time step. I have obtained the following plots on MATLAB (images attached):

1. The initial temperature values for nodes no. 1 to 200 is 303K and rest of them are at 573 K for all the time steps.

2. The initial temperature values for nodes no. 1 to 1200 is 303K and rest of them are at 573 K for all the time steps.


I want to use the plot no. 1 but a great variation is observed during the initial iterations of the code (rest of the plots are okay and validated against experimental data).

I am not able to understand the behaviour of the solution obtained and its dependency on initial values. Though it is well known and obvious that the solution depends on the initial values, how can I decide what nodes should be kept at the temperature of 303K and the 573K? If I keep all the nodes at initial temperature 573K, the results are not satisfying.

I am a beginner and I could not find an appropriate source of finding a solution to such a problem. Please provide me with some possible explanation or let me know about the source/reference where I can read and learn more about the issue. Any kind of guidance is really appreciated.

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (161.1 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (144.5 KB, 2 views)
Deeds is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convective term in heat equation for rotating solids vabishek OpenFOAM Programming & Development 8 June 24, 2020 11:10
Continuity Equation for multicomponent simulation lordluan CFX 15 May 19, 2020 18:36
Calculation of the Governing Equations Mihail CFX 7 September 7, 2014 06:27
Heat conduction problem help lucky_m_m Main CFD Forum 0 October 17, 2013 08:15
Does FOAM converge to exact solution in Laplace equation? santiagomarquezd OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 March 26, 2010 07:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27.