CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 17, 2020, 00:44
Default Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of
  #1
New Member
 
Suraj Garad
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Kharagpur
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
surajk.garad101 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

"Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of ....." it this an error? For my simulations, it is for nearly 50% of the total cell count but still, my solution is getting converged. I have also attached a picture with this thread.

Any suggestions are welcome.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg turbulent viscosity.jpg (116.3 KB, 18 views)
surajk.garad101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 01:17
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,676
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Check your boundary conditions and initial conditions. You shouldn't get that warning if a case converges to a reasonable solution. That high of a turbulent viscosity ratio is non-physical / borderline insanity

Last edited by LuckyTran; March 19, 2020 at 06:26.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 01:26
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Suraj Garad
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Kharagpur
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
surajk.garad101 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the reply,

I am doing a 2D simulation. I am using open channel wave conditions at the inlet (left) to generate the wave, top and right-hand sides are pressure outlet.

Please let me know if any other inputs are required.
surajk.garad101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 01:41
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,676
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Boundary conditions for turbulence?

Initial conditions for everything?

Actual values for everything... not just their types.


Anything that you left default is likely a culprit and it's likely (my guess) the turbulence BC's and initial conditions.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 01:56
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Suraj Garad
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Kharagpur
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
surajk.garad101 is on a distinguished road
VoF model, implicit body force, open channel flow and open channel wave BC

K-w SST model, default settings

Numerical beach treatment is activated

Pressure-Velocity coupling-- SIMPLE
Pressure-- PRESTO
Momentum -- Second order upwind
Vol. fraction-- Modified HRIC
Turbulent K.E. -- Second order upwind
Sp. dissipation rate-- Second order upwind
Transient formulation -- second-order implicit
URF -- default values
surajk.garad101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 07:18
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,676
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Those are neither boundary conditions nor initial conditions. Specifically I'm looking for what you specified as the inlet for k and omega and the initial condition for k and omega.

Hint: they'll be numbers.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 08:07
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Suraj Garad
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Kharagpur
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
surajk.garad101 is on a distinguished road
I think you are looking for these values.

Thanks for your patience
surajk.garad101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 09:17
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,676
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
I'm really not interested in your model settings and urf's.

Okay so you have an inlet turbulence intensity of 2% and viscosity ratio of 2. Is the 2 correct? That's a low number but still reasonable for a laminar inlet.

Alright. Now what about the initial conditions? Hint: they're in the initialization pane. What did you do? Standard where you manually set them or did you do some automatic hyrbid/FMG initialization where you have no control? If you don't provide the proper initialization then of course you will into issues with the turbulence viscosity ratio while the case is iterating..
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2020, 23:08
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Suraj Garad
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Kharagpur
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
surajk.garad101 is on a distinguished road
Inlet turbulence intensity of 2% and viscosity ratio of 2, that I have provided from one reference. I don't know how much it is applicable.

I have selected standard initialization and initial values are taken as default.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 90348406_2496490290569038_159767685285019648_n.jpg (157.6 KB, 13 views)
surajk.garad101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2020, 08:33
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,676
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
So your initial condition for k is 1 (which is a very high value) and initial condition for omega is also 1 (which is a very very low value). That's how you end up with these viscosity ratio warnings.


Either you make better guesses. Or keep iterating and pray they go away and eventually converge to the correct values.
Светлана likes this.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2020, 00:05
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Suraj Garad
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Kharagpur
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
surajk.garad101 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for clearing my doubts.

I have checked with lower values k and omega of 1e-06 (which are very low values). That's removed my error. Before that, I have checked with different values but the error was still there after that only I posted the thread.

I will check as you recommended i.e. lower values of K and higher value of omega. Please can you mention the range of values for k and omega?
surajk.garad101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2020, 06:26
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,676
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Convert your inlet BC of 2% and 2 into k and omega. Or again you can just keep iterating and wait and get the value from the solution.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Identifying cells having Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.000e+05 Sayantan Biswas FLUENT 0 September 20, 2019 04:49
Problem with divergence TDK FLUENT 13 December 14, 2018 06:00
RSM+2nd ordedr causes turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of.... khsiavash Main CFD Forum 10 January 7, 2016 12:30
turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio Alex_B FLUENT 16 September 12, 2012 13:17
On limiting to turbulent viscosity ratio! varghese FLUENT 2 November 15, 2003 08:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:55.