CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Yplus value as an indicator of mesh convergence

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 28, 2020, 16:46
Default Yplus value as an indicator of mesh convergence
  #1
New Member
 
renos
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6
renos is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am trying to simulate breaking waves interactions with structures such as monopiles. I had made a convergence study and my results are close to the experimental results. Although, because I am using a turbulence model ( k- omega SST ) and wall functions are activated near the walls the maximum yplus value during the wave breaking is very big (around 5000) and the average is 500 and minimum around 0.2 . What should I do with the results? Are the results correct? why I have very close results with the experiment despite of the high value of Yplus?

Thanks you very much,

Kind regards,

Renos
renos is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2020, 19:15
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 11
Jeeloong is on a distinguished road
The Wall Y plus is an indication of your first cell distance from the wall. Usually you need it to decide whether to use wall-function to resolve the boundary layer of the turbulence flow or to use a low y+ value to fully resolve the boundary layer.

The solution convergence is dependent on the residuals levels of your simulation. You can set the criteria in the drop down tree.

To ensure that you flow has reach steady-state, monitor a variable with respect to iteration, once it stop changing, your solution has reach a final converged solution. The accuracy of your solution is dependent on your mesh resolution (how dense). If the information near the wall is important then wise to use low y+ such as y+ = 1 and use near-wall-treatment (fully resolve BL), if only core value is important use y+ > 30 (ANSYS Fluent guideline)
Jeeloong is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2020, 19:49
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Overly simplified: wall-normal resolution is more important to model the impact of wall shear stress. If wall shear stress has little impact on the physical phenomenon you are trying to simulate, wall-normal resolution is less important. So it is at least plausible that you can get reasonable results, even with very high y+ values.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature giulio.topazio OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 August 22, 2012 09:03
[Gmsh] 2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH aeroslacker OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 January 19, 2012 03:52
Force can not converge colopolo CFX 13 October 4, 2011 22:03
How to control Minximum mesh space? hung FLUENT 7 April 18, 2005 09:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:52.