
[Sponsors] 
September 30, 2022, 09:00 
Development of RANS equations

#1 
New Member
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 2 
Hello everyone,
I am learning the RANS equations for incompressible flows. I am not sure to understand the classical development of RANS equations as given in the attached figure. 1) Why eq(4) is simplified compared to eq(3) ? 2) I think that eq(4) is the conservative form of the equation while eq(3) is the nonconservative form. Is that true ? 3) The author introduces a "null term" to obtain eq(4). This null term is . I understand that is equal to 0 if we consider an established flow. However, if is null too it means that this term should then also be null in the left side of eq(3) and eq(4). Am I right ? So why not simplifying it from the begining ? Thanks ! 

September 30, 2022, 10:20 

#2 
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,145
Rep Power: 61 
Yeah nothing is being simplified.
(3) is indeed the convective form and (4) would be the conservation form if the derivation is correct. If (3) & (4) is supposed to be the NavierStokes then your author has mixed up a u with a v, or a y with an x. This null term is of course the divergence free incompressibility constraint. The sum must go to zero , not the individual term . 

September 30, 2022, 12:03 

#3 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,290
Rep Power: 67 
Quote:
Where do you find these equations? To be honest, I don't like that... I suppose they should illustrate the momentum equations in quasilinear and divergence form but why the diffusive term has only one component? 

September 30, 2022, 12:33 

#4 
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,145
Rep Power: 61 
Yeah I don't like it either. Either we are not looking at the navierstokes or this is a really interesting derivation.
Not only is (3) questionable, they should be adding the entire continuity equation and not just the solenoidal condition if they want to go to the conservative form. And even then, where are all the other missing terms...? 

Tags 
equation, navierstokes, rans, simplification 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Solving coupled scalar transport equations in openFoam  pavaninguva  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  1  December 28, 2019 09:28 
Calculation of the Governing Equations  Mihail  CFX  7  September 7, 2014 07:27 
modelling Differential equations in a udf  RikardMNorén  Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming  2  October 1, 2013 04:36 
Reynolds transport, turbulence model, etc  Beginner  Main CFD Forum  1  January 7, 2009 06:36 
RANS equations  Alex  CFX  4  May 10, 2005 04:59 