 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
August 8, 2000, 12:56
|
Re: FLUENT- your opinion
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It really depends on what you want to use it for. I don't know about Phenics, but I've using Fluent for quite a long time. Fluent runs almost perfect on UNIX workstations, but on PC, I would say about 75-80% as good as on UNIX.
For educational purpose, I would recommend you get the older version of Fluent v4.X as well, which only supports structured grid, and for simple problems, you can generated the mesh and solve all in Fluent (now in Fluent 5, you need Gambit for the model). Otherwise Fluent5 & Gambit is the choice. |
|
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Problem of Fluent Interpreted UDF: parse error | knight | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 25 | August 16, 2018 10:26 |
| Fluent jobs through pbs | ibnkureshi | FLUENT | 5 | June 9, 2011 13:43 |
| Compared MRFSimpleFoam and Fluent in a centrifugal pump! | renyun0511 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | July 6, 2010 06:24 |
| Fluent 12.0 is worst then Fluent 6.2 | herntan | FLUENT | 5 | December 14, 2009 02:57 |
| Problems in lauching FLUENT | Lourival | FLUENT | 3 | January 16, 2008 16:48 |
Threaded Mode
