CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Pressure from Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 28, 2022, 09:37
Default Pressure from Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements
  #1
Member
 
E
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 8
IbizaFR is on a distinguished road
Hello to everyone,

I got the instantaneous 2D velocity measurements from Particle Image Velocimetry inside the region of a hydraulic jump.

I want to calculate the mean time pressure field from the mean time velocity measurements by the numerical solution of the Reynolds averaged Poisson Pressure equation.

I solve the resulting system with the Jacobi method but the iterative algorithm does not converge as the absolute difference between the updated pressure field and the pressure field calculated from the previous iteration is not getting smaller.

Any ideas for the problem ?

Thank you.
IbizaFR is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2022, 17:20
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,769
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by IbizaFR View Post
Hello to everyone,

I got the instantaneous 2D velocity measurements from Particle Image Velocimetry inside the region of a hydraulic jump.

I want to calculate the mean time pressure field from the mean time velocity measurements by the numerical solution of the Reynolds averaged Poisson Pressure equation.

I solve the resulting system with the Jacobi method but the iterative algorithm does not converge as the absolute difference between the updated pressure field and the pressure field calculated from the previous iteration is not getting smaller.

Any ideas for the problem ?

Thank you.



Could you give the details? I suppose you want to solve

Div Grad p = source,

the LHS being in your case?
But to state the full Poisson problem you need to prescribe the BCs, how did you prescribe that?
Are you working on a cartesian structured grid?
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2022, 05:00
Default
  #3
Member
 
E
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 8
IbizaFR is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
Could you give the details? I suppose you want to solve

Div Grad p = source,

the LHS being in your case?
But to state the full Poisson problem you need to prescribe the BCs, how did you prescribe that?
Are you working on a cartesian structured grid?

Yes I want to solve Div Grad p=source. The equation follows the Reynolds average approach, so Poisson equation for pressure also contains the Reynolds shear stress terms in the RHS.
All BCs are Newmman conditions regarding the grad(p) calculated from the two dimensional Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes equations.
I work on a cartesian structured grid which is the same with the grid that the velocity has been measured with PIV.
IbizaFR is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2022, 05:06
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,769
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by IbizaFR View Post
Yes I want to solve Div Grad p=source. The equation follows the Reynolds average approach, so Poisson equation for pressure also contains the Reynolds shear stress terms in the RHS.
All BCs are Newmman conditions regarding the grad(p) calculated from the two dimensional Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes equations.
I work on a cartesian structured grid which is the same with the grid that the velocity has been measured with PIV.



Tu ensure convergence of an iterative method, you have to fulfill the compatibility condition. Thus, I suppose you prescribed the Neumann conditions in a non correct way.

Check for similar discussions in this forum.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2022, 06:43
Default
  #5
Member
 
E
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 8
IbizaFR is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
Tu ensure convergence of an iterative method, you have to fulfill the compatibility condition. Thus, I suppose you prescribed the Neumann conditions in a non correct way.

Check for similar discussions in this forum.
Please can you propose me papers regarding the compatibility condition ?

Thank you.
IbizaFR is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2022, 08:43
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,769
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by IbizaFR View Post
Please can you propose me papers regarding the compatibility condition ?

Thank you.



That is a classic topic in mathematical anaysis of PDE. Just search on Google:
https://www.google.com/search?client...eumann+problem
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
viscosity udf don't use correct temperature and strain rate rezvani Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 8 May 27, 2021 05:40
Getting divergence while increasing the back pressure at pressure outlet greenfields15 FLUENT 0 March 18, 2018 23:39
Periodic flow using Cyclic - comparison with Fluent nusivares OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 December 12, 2017 05:35
Particle tracking error alchem OpenFOAM Bugs 5 May 6, 2017 16:30
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) DS & HB Main CFD Forum 0 January 8, 2000 15:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09.