CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Ncrit for a glider Xfoil. How to use it. GPT4 answer

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 10, 2023, 12:16
Lightbulb Ncrit for a glider Xfoil. How to use it. GPT4 answer
  #1
New Member
 
Alan Mattanó
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Italy, Argentina and US
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
AlanMattanó is on a distinguished road
Here is some info about Ncrit in the relationship to a soaring glider. These examples illustrate how adjusting the Ncrit value in XFOIL can help engineers and researchers to more accurately simulate various flow conditions and better understand the performance of airfoils in different scenarios. It is crucial to validate the chosen Ncrit value against experimental data or other reliable sources.

Author of the answers: Alan Mattanó
Author of the answers: ChatGPT4 (edit to fit)


Can you explain me "Ncrit" is (in Xfoil) and how it works?

"Ncrit" is a parameter used in XFOIL.

Ncrit, short for critical amplification factor, is a parameter used in XFOIL to control the transition between laminar and turbulent flow over the airfoil surface. In the context of XFOIL, the transition from laminar to turbulent flow is mainly influenced by the Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) wave instability mechanism, which is characterized by the growth of small disturbances in the boundary layer.

The Ncrit value essentially determines the sensitivity of the flow to these disturbances. A higher Ncrit value represents a less sensitive flow (i.e., more likely to remain laminar), while a lower Ncrit value represents a more sensitive flow (i.e., more likely to transition to turbulent). The choice of Ncrit value can significantly impact the computed drag and lift coefficients, as turbulent flow generally has higher skin friction drag compared to laminar flow.

In XFOIL, the default Ncrit value is 9. However, it can be adjusted by the user to better match experimental data or simulate different flow conditions. Choosing the appropriate Ncrit value can be challenging, as it depends on factors such as airfoil geometry, flow conditions, and surface roughness. Users often rely on experimental data, empirical correlations, or trial and error to determine a suitable Ncrit value for their specific application.




SOARING Simulator
Give me some examples


Wind Turbine Airfoil Analysis:
For wind turbine airfoil analysis, you might want to use a higher Ncrit value (e.g., 12 to 14) to account for the relatively low turbulence levels typically present in the atmospheric boundary layer. This allows for a more accurate prediction of the airfoil's performance in the wind turbine environment.

High-Performance Sailplane Airfoil Design:
In the case of high-performance sailplanes, maintaining laminar flow over a large portion of the airfoil is crucial for minimizing drag. To simulate this, you might choose a higher Ncrit value (e.g., 12 to 14) to study the effects of different airfoil shapes on laminar flow extent and the overall performance of the airfoil.

Icing Conditions on Aircraft Wings:
Causes surface roughness and increased turbulence levels. In this case, you might use a lower Ncrit value (e.g., 5 to 7) to simulate the more turbulent flow conditions expected with ice accretion on the wing surface.

Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Design:
In micro air vehicles (MAVs) or small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), the transition from laminar to turbulent flow can occur at lower Ncrit values. In this case, you might use a lower Ncrit value (e.g., 6 to 8) to better represent the flow conditions experienced by the airfoil.




SOARING Simulator
A glider flighting soring in a windy day close to the ground?


Factors that can impact the transition from laminar to turbulent flow:

Ground Effect:
When flying close to the ground, the glider experiences ground effect, which is the interference of the ground with the airflow around the wing. This causes an increase in lift and a decrease in induced drag, which can lead to better performance. However, ground effect can also alter the boundary layer behavior, potentially causing earlier or delayed transition to turbulence.

Wind Shear:
Near the ground, the wind speed can vary significantly due to friction with the Earth's surface, creating wind shear. This can cause local changes in the angle of attack and flow disturbances, which may affect the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

Turbulence:
In windy conditions and close to the ground, the atmospheric turbulence levels are generally higher. This can lead to earlier transition from laminar to turbulent flow, increasing skin friction drag and potentially impacting the glider's performance.

Updrafts and Thermals:
Glider pilots often use updrafts and thermals for soaring flight, which can be more prevalent on windy days. These phenomena can locally impact the flow conditions around the wing, potentially affecting the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

When analyzing a glider flying close to the ground in windy conditions using XFOIL, you might want to choose a lower Ncrit value (e.g., 7 to 9)


SOARING Simulator
Soaring at 700 meters?


A glider soaring at 700 meters (approximately 2,300 feet) above ground level, the atmospheric conditions and flow behavior can be different compared to flying close to the ground:

Atmospheric Turbulence:
At 700 meters, the atmospheric turbulence levels are generally lower than those near the ground. This can help maintain laminar flow over a larger portion of the airfoil, resulting in reduced skin friction drag.

Wind Shear:
At higher altitudes, wind shear can still be present but is generally less pronounced than close to the ground. This reduces the likelihood of local changes in the angle of attack and flow disturbances that could affect the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

Updrafts and Thermals:
Glider pilots often use updrafts and thermals for soaring flight, and these phenomena can still be encountered at 700 meters. These localized flow conditions can impact the boundary layer behavior and the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

You might choose a higher Ncrit value (e.g., 10 to 12)



SOARING Simulator
A glider soaring at 2000m far from updrafts and thermals?


A glider soaring at 2,000 meters (approximately 6,560 feet) above ground level and far from updrafts and thermals, the atmospheric conditions can be quite stable, and the flow behavior around the airfoil may be less influenced by localized flow disturbances. Under these conditions, some factors that can impact the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and the overall aerodynamic performance of the airfoil include:

Atmospheric Turbulence:
At 2,000 meters, the atmospheric turbulence levels are generally lower than those near the ground or in the vicinity of updrafts and thermals. Help maintain laminar flow over a larger portion of the airfoil, resulting in reduced skin friction drag.

Wind Shear:
At higher altitudes, wind shear can still be present but is typically less pronounced than close to the ground. This reduces the likelihood of local changes in the angle of attack and flow disturbances that could affect the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

Air Density and Viscosity:
At higher altitudes, the air density and dynamic viscosity decrease, which affects the Reynolds number and the boundary layer behavior. This can influence the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and the overall aerodynamic performance of the airfoil.

Stable flow conditions and lower turbulence levels at 2,000 meters far from updrafts and thermals, you might choose a higher Ncrit value (e.g., 11 to 14) when analyzing the glider.



SOARING Simulator
Difference between A modern glossy cote cover glider and an old one with fabric cover?


Here are some specific differences between the two types of gliders:

Surface Smoothness:
Modern gliders with glossy coat covers typically have smoother surfaces due to the use of advanced composite materials and manufacturing techniques. This smoothness helps maintain laminar flow over a larger portion of the airfoil, reducing skin friction drag. In contrast, older gliders with fabric covers often have rougher surfaces, which can promote earlier transition to turbulent flow and increase drag.

Drag:
The smoother surface of modern gliders with glossy coat covers helps reduce skin friction drag, contributing to better aerodynamic performance and efficiency. Conversely, the rougher surface of older gliders with fabric covers can increase skin friction drag and reduce overall performance.

Lift-to-Drag Ratio:
The lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) is a measure of an aircraft's aerodynamic efficiency. Modern gliders with glossy coat covers generally have higher L/D ratios due to their smoother surfaces and reduced drag, enabling them to glide more efficiently and cover longer distances with less altitude loss. Older gliders with fabric covers usually have lower L/D ratios because of their higher drag levels.

Maintenance:
Modern gliders with glossy coat covers often require less maintenance compared to older gliders with fabric covers. The advanced materials used in modern gliders are more resistant to wear, corrosion, and UV degradation, which helps reduce maintenance requirements and extend the glider's service life. Fabric covers, on the other hand, may need more frequent inspection and repairs due to potential damage from moisture, UV exposure, and general wear.

For modern gliders with glossy coat covers, you might choose a higher Ncrit value (e.g., 11 to 14) to account for the smoother surface and the potential for more extended laminar flow regions. For older gliders with fabric covers, you might use a lower Ncrit value (e.g., 7 to 10) to account for the rougher surface and earlier transition to turbulent flow.


SOARING Simulator
And a older gliders with fabric covers, in a windy day close to the ground with insects in the leading edge?


Factors that can impact the boundary layer include:

Surface Roughness:
Older gliders with fabric covers typically have rougher surfaces compared to modern gliders with glossy coat covers. This roughness can promote earlier transition to turbulent flow and increase skin friction drag.

Insects on the Leading Edge:
The presence of insects on the leading edge further increases the surface roughness, which can cause the boundary layer to transition to turbulence even earlier. This additional roughness can significantly degrade the aerodynamic performance and efficiency of the glider.

Ground Effect:
When flying close to the ground, the glider experiences ground effect, which alters the boundary layer behavior and can affect the transition from laminar to turbulent flow. Ground effect generally results in an increase in lift and a decrease in induced drag.

Wind Shear and Turbulence:
Near the ground on a windy day, the wind shear and atmospheric turbulence levels are generally higher. These factors can cause local changes in the angle of attack, flow disturbances, and earlier transition to turbulent flow.

You might choose a lower Ncrit value (e.g., 4 to 6)


SOARING Simulator
And a modern glossy cote cover glider, on a windy day close to the ground with insects in the leading edge?


factors include:

Surface Smoothness:
Modern gliders with glossy coat covers typically have smoother surfaces due to the use of advanced composite materials and manufacturing techniques. However, the presence of insects on the leading edge can increase the surface roughness, which can promote earlier transition to turbulent flow and increase skin friction drag.

Insects on the Leading Edge:
The presence of insects on the leading edge affects the smoothness of the airfoil surface, causing the boundary layer to transition to turbulence earlier than it would on a clean surface. This additional roughness can degrade the aerodynamic performance and efficiency of the glider.

Ground Effect:
When flying close to the ground, the glider experiences ground effect, which alters the boundary layer behavior and can affect the transition from laminar to turbulent flow. Ground effect generally results in an increase in lift and a decrease in induced drag.

Wind Shear and Turbulence:
Near the ground on a windy day, the wind shear and atmospheric turbulence levels are generally higher. These factors can cause local changes in the angle of attack, flow disturbances, and earlier transition to turbulent flow.

Considering these factors, when analyzing a modern glider with a glossy coat cover flying close to the ground on a windy day with insects on the leading edge using XFOIL, you might choose a lower Ncrit value (e.g., 7 to 9).




SOARING Simulator
And an older glider with fabric covers, in a windy day with heavy rain close to the ground with insects in the leading edge?


These factors include:

Surface Roughness:
Older gliders with fabric covers typically have rougher surfaces.

Insects on the Leading Edge:
The presence of insects on the leading edge affects the airfoil surface's smoothness.

Heavy Rain:
It can alter the airfoil, which causes the transition earlier. The rain also adds weight to the glider, affecting its overall performance.

Ground Effect:
Ground effect generally results in an increase in lift and a decrease in induced drag.

Wind Shear and Turbulence:
These factors can cause local changes in the angle of attack, flow disturbances, and earlier transition to turbulent flow.

An older glider with fabric covers flying close to the ground on a windy day with heavy rain and insects on the leading edge using XFOIL, you might choose a lower Ncrit value (e.g., 3 to 5).



SOARING Simulator
When is the Ncrit value lower than 3?


An Ncrit value lower than 3 is generally used to represent cases where the flow conditions are highly turbulent, the surface roughness is significantly high, or both. Such situations may lead to an earlier transition from laminar to turbulent flow and a significant increase in skin friction drag. However, it's important to note that using such low Ncrit values is quite rare in practical applications.

Examples:

Extreme surface roughness: If an airfoil surface has experienced significant damage or has an exceptionally rough surface due to manufacturing defects or wear, it may cause the boundary layer to transition to turbulence very early.

Severe turbulence: In cases where an aircraft encounters extremely turbulent flow conditions, such as flying through a severe storm, heavy rain, or a region with intense wind shear, the boundary layer may transition to turbulence earlier than under more typical conditions.

Specialized applications: Some specialized applications or experimental setups might require a low Ncrit value to simulate specific conditions or to explore the aerodynamic performance at the edge of the operating envelope.




SOARING Simulator
What is the highest Ncrit value case scenario?


The highest Ncrit values typically correspond to scenarios where the flow conditions are exceptionally smooth and stable, resulting in an extended region of laminar flow and a delayed transition to turbulent flow. While there isn't an absolute upper limit for Ncrit values, values in the range of 14 to 20 (very smooth and stable flow conditions).

Examples of scenarios where high Ncrit values might be appropriate include:

Extremely smooth surfaces: Advanced manufacturing techniques or surface treatments can result in exceptionally smooth airfoil surfaces, which can help maintain laminar flow over a more significant portion of the airfoil and reduce skin friction drag.

High-altitude flight: At high altitudes, atmospheric turbulence and wind shear are typically lower than at lower altitudes. These stable conditions can promote laminar flow and delay the transition to turbulent flow.

Laminar flow control: In some cases, active or passive laminar flow control techniques, such as suction or boundary layer control systems, can be used to maintain laminar flow over more significant portions of an airfoil, delaying the transition to turbulent flow.

Low-speed flight in calm conditions: When an aircraft is flying at low speeds in calm, stable atmospheric conditions with minimal turbulence, the boundary layer can remain laminar for longer.




SOARING Simulator
Let's talk about point number 4. So if a smooth modern glider flies faster in calm, stable atmospheric conditions atmospheric condition, will it have a lower Ncrit value than a Low-speed flight?


Yes, you are correct. When a smooth modern glider flies faster in calm, stable atmospheric conditions, the Ncrit value could be lower compared to a low-speed flight. The reason for this is related to the Reynolds number, which characterizes the flow around the airfoil and plays a role in the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

Reynolds number (Re) is defined as:

Re = (ρ * V * L) / μ

where ρ is the air density, V is the flow velocity (or airspeed), L is a characteristic length (typically the airfoil's chord length), and μ is the dynamic viscosity of the air.

When the glider flies faster, the Reynolds number increases due to the higher flow velocity (V). An increased Reynolds number can lead to an earlier transition from laminar to turbulent flow, as the flow becomes more sensitive to disturbances. Consequently, a lower Ncrit value may be more appropriate for representing the boundary layer behavior in this case.




SOARING Simulator
Can you give me some Ncrit value examples in this case?


In the case of a smooth modern glider flying at different speeds in calm, stable atmospheric conditions, the appropriate Ncrit values may vary depending on the specific flight conditions and the sensitivity of the boundary layer to disturbances. Here are some general examples of Ncrit values for different flight speed scenarios:

Low-speed flight in calm conditions:
For a modern glider flying at low speeds in calm, stable atmospheric conditions, you might choose a higher Ncrit value, such as 14 to 16, to represent the smoother surface and the potential for extended laminar flow regions.

Moderate-speed flight in calm conditions:
For a modern glider flying at moderate speeds in calm, stable atmospheric conditions, you might choose a slightly lower Ncrit value, such as 11 to 13, to account for the increased Reynolds number and the potential for an earlier transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

High-speed flight in calm conditions:
For a modern glider flying at high speeds in calm, stable atmospheric conditions, you might choose an even lower Ncrit value, such as 9 to 11, as the increased Reynolds number can lead to an earlier transition from laminar to turbulent flow.



SOARING Simulator
Is 200km per hour in this case: Low-speed, Moderate-speed, High-speed?


For a modern glider, a speed of 200 km/h (about 124 mph or 108 knots) would generally be considered a high-speed flight. Gliders are designed for efficient performance at relatively low speeds, with typical cruising speeds in the range of 80 to 150 km/h (50 to 93 mph or 43 to 81 knots). Speeds above this range are usually associated with rapid descents or specific high-speed maneuvers, such as finishing a cross-country flight or trying to reach a landing area quickly.

In the high-speed flight scenario (200 km/h) in calm, stable atmospheric conditions, you might choose a lower Ncrit value, such as 9 to 11, as the increased Reynolds number can lead to an earlier transition from laminar to turbulent flow. However, the actual Ncrit value should be based on the specific glider design, the environmental conditions, and any available experimental data or other reliable sources of information. It is always essential to validate the chosen Ncrit value against actual flight data whenever possible to ensure accurate analysis and predictions.
AlanMattanó is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
ncrit, xfoil

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wave Driven Glider Fatin Ihsan OpenFOAM Verification & Validation 0 October 24, 2022 00:46
Glider Geometry clean up jluisgon09 Main CFD Forum 1 April 11, 2019 05:31
Simulating underwater glider hydrodynamics lfan OpenFOAM 0 February 15, 2012 20:25
Glider simulation Pedro Main CFD Forum 0 June 12, 2006 10:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59.