|
[Sponsors] |
Questions about the non-orthogonal term in surface normal gradients (FVM) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 26, 2024, 13:10 |
Question about the non-orthogonal term in surface normal gradients (FVM)
|
#1 |
Member
Rubén
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Munich
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 11 |
In FVM, the surface normal velocity gradient is used when discretizing the diffusion term.
According to Dr. Jasak thesis (setion 3.3.1.3) the gradient of the face normal is decomposed into orthogonal and non-orthogonal components. While the orthogonal component is assessed implicitly, the non-orthogonal counterpart is explicitly evaluated as a source term, leveraging the known velocity field. I'm curious about why the non-orthogonal aspect isn't handled implicitly. Are there any advantages to its explicit implementation? Thank you so much for your time! Last edited by Yuby; February 29, 2024 at 05:42. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] gmshToFoam generates patches with 0 faces and 0 points | Simurgh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | August 25, 2023 07:58 |
Calculation Tangential & Normal gradients of a Scalar near a surface. | AnthonyP | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 12 | July 22, 2020 09:01 |
Normal lines to airfoil surface | aoifem | FLUENT | 0 | June 24, 2020 19:29 |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 15:45 |
Normal - Helical Surface | m. malik | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 3, 2006 12:56 |