CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

implicit coding

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 27, 2001, 05:05
Default implicit coding
Posts: n/a
I have written an implicit code to solve the set of hyperbolic equatuions describing the solar wind. The parameters solved for are particle density, flow velocity, plasma temperature and heat flow in a so-called eight moment description. The equations are only solved in one spatial dimension. The aim is to study steady state solutions. I solve time dependent equations and let them evolve in time until a steady state is reached. My question is how important is the treatment of the non-linear advective term? Is the steady state solution dependent on the treatment of this term? I have coded a first order upwind Godunov flux and compared it with a second order Van-leer flux. The steady state solutions are equal, but shocks are steeper when a second order flux is used. But the point is not to study shocks, but to evolove transients out of the system and reach a steady state. Have anyone compared the different treatments of the advective term for implicit schemes?
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help. implicit discritization dearboy Main CFD Forum 0 November 25, 2010 22:46
Can anyone explain the difference between these implicit concepts? bearcat Main CFD Forum 0 February 20, 2010 19:39
how implicit is implicit? Joe cool Main CFD Forum 7 July 16, 2004 11:10
User coding on NT w2k Philip Jones Siemens 0 November 26, 2001 04:43
UDF : Chemical Reaction in Catalytic Converter adhimac FLUENT 1 March 27, 2001 14:04

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:49.