# Solution in Physical or Computational ???

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 30, 2001, 11:12 Solution in Physical or Computational ??? #1 Mohammad Kermani Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi dear friends, There has always been a question between the fluid solvers? Which one of the following approaches are more suitable to solve fluid equations? 1) To directly solve the fluid equations in physical domain by finite volume approach or 2) to transform the fluid equations into a generalized coordinates system (into a computational domain) and solve in this domain. There are some very well know benefits of (1) as they are very flexible and can easily occupy the domain of compuation. Are there any good reference out there that discusses one against the other or can any one explain on this issue. Thanks. M

 March 30, 2001, 14:49 Re: Solution in Physical or Computational ??? #2 Selina Tracy Guest   Posts: n/a If I am correct, the latter case is using so-called bfc system. I learned cfd by (1) but more than 10 years I have been using (2) which is more general though less intuitive at first (but the results are usually expressed by u,v,w,p and scalars in Cartesian which we can easily understand). So, personally, I prefer (2) because it's been working well for numerous models with curved surfaces. In terms of accuracy of the results, I have no idea since there are so many factors changing the results. Selina

 March 31, 2001, 05:00 Re: Solution in Physical or Computational ??? #3 reza Guest   Posts: n/a Hi I have a question on the subject of your question in the following way: What is our final result by doing strictly CFD and beeing appart of the physics behind, do we go far from theoretical and most analytical discussions when we go into CFD codes and methods. As an example the case of dense gas dynamics and the usage of time coupled p-version least square finite element method on the governing equations (NS, Enskog,...) God bless you Reza

 April 2, 2001, 02:29 Re: Solution in Physical or Computational ??? #4 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). If you have not studied the boundary layer theory, then it is time to do so. (2). The boundary layer theory book by Schlichting is a good reference and text book. (3). After you finished reading the book, let's know your conclusion.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post gueynard a. Main CFD Forum 19 June 27, 2014 21:22 prapanj Main CFD Forum 2 July 30, 2011 19:07 nakor FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 0 April 22, 2011 04:34 analyse In India Main CFD Forum 10 March 9, 2007 04:01 Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 6 February 5, 1999 02:16