CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Residual Smoothing works?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By clifford bradford

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 4, 2001, 14:44
Default Residual Smoothing works?
Posts: n/a

Residual smoothing is a kind of averaging of the residuals over the neighboring cells, right? Well, It doesn't work with my FV code (steady 2D Compressible Euler).

It is to increase the support of the stencil and increase the stability so that one can use a larger time step. But can it also contaminate the residuals? because you're altering the residuals. I'd like to understand the idea more completely. Can anyone justify the residual averaging? Does it really work?


  Reply With Quote

Old   September 11, 2001, 20:53
Default Re: Residual Smoothing works?
clifford bradford
Posts: n/a
I'm not a code writer but I have used a CFD code that uses residual averaging (smoothing) and it did work for me. The difficulty with it is that it's supposed to allow you to increase the time step also and in multi-dimensions it is difficult to evaluate the increased time step you can get with it. You may have convergence problems with it. I can't say. The original references on it I know about are some papers in the 80s by Jameson and his colleagues. These articles are "classics" so you should be able to find them in an engineering library. As you probably know residual smoothing works by applying a Laplacian smoother to the flowfield at each time step. The idea is that,ideally, at convergence the residual is smooth (i.e. very close to zero), however, during convergence the residual is not smooth due to the necessarily incorrect initial conditions. So to improve convergence the residual is smoothed repeatedly. The combination of residual smoothing and the increased time step should increase convergence but the combination of stronger smoothing and increased time step can lead to instability the limits of which can be difficult to evaluate. Efforts in this area are ongoing from my own investigation. To be convservative you can apply smoothing without increasing the time step and see what happens, it has worked for me. You may also want to use less strong smoothing.
Tobyskernel likes this.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 March 28, 2016 11:08
transsonic nozzle with rhoSimpleFoam Unseen OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 April 16, 2014 03:38
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence jonmec OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 28, 2011 05:24
Differences between serial and parallel runs carsten OpenFOAM Bugs 11 September 12, 2008 11:16

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48.