
[Sponsors] 
July 8, 2003, 23:44 
Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Dear All:
Could you please correct me if I am wrong about the following: 1. When we are dealing with rough wall, low Reynold number two equations model can not be used. The ONLY option that we have is only implementing wall function, even though it is well documented that the wall function is bad when it comes to flow with separation and adverse pressure gradient. Thank's in advance Danny Tandra 

July 9, 2003, 03:21 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi,
kepsilon low Reynolds number models can't take the wall roughness into account. However, kw low Reynolds models can handle it with a proper boundary condition. Wilcox's book is a good reference. Hope this helps, Gorka 

July 9, 2003, 12:04 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thank's for the information.
I have Wilcox book in my hand right now, but I can not find section that explained the use of surface roughness in low reynolds KW model. There is a section explaining the use of numerical roughness strip used to improve low reynold kw model. But the numerical roughness strip is not really the physical wall roughness. From my quick reading of that section, this numerical roughness strip is just helping us to choose a better value for W at the wall (smooth wall). If I am not mistaken, by definition, low reynold two equation model imposed no slip boundary condition, which mean that we set the velocity at the wall to be 0 in all direction. Now, If the surface is rough, it is not clear where you want to put your zero velocity. Unless we want to really incorporate the roughness of the wall in to our grids (which is most of the time this is not really possible, especially when we have "Ugly" wall) Danny 

July 10, 2003, 06:21 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I can only speak from our experience (CFX5): Wall roughness can only be used with epsilon based turbulence Modelling (keps, RSM eps) but NOT any model with omega. I'm not sure whether this is a limitation of CFX only but as far as I can see the limitation seems quite fundamental.


July 10, 2003, 07:35 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Bart,
In Fluent the wall roughness is considered by the kw model, almost as is explained in Wilcox's book. Best regards, Gorka 

July 10, 2003, 07:45 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Danny,
In "Chapter 4.7.2 Sourface Roughness" (Wilcox), regarding the arbitrary value of w at a wall, it is said: "it provides a natural way to incorporate effects of surface roughness through surface boundary conditions". As it is explained next, the roughness heigh is taken into account by modifying the value of w at the wall. Hope this helps, Gorka 

July 10, 2003, 08:14 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

FLUENT rules?!


July 15, 2003, 11:38 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#8 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Fathi Tarada did some work on the prediction of rough wall boundary layers using a lowRe 2equation model, Int.J.Heat Fluid Flow , 11(4), 1990, p331. I seem to recall it was a lowRe ke model rather than the lowRe WilcoxKolmogorov model, but I may be wrong.


July 15, 2003, 13:01 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#9 
Guest
Posts: n/a

First of all, low Re number keps models have almost nothing to deal with physics, so you are allow to do everything with them since you get the correct behavior.
In fact, if we use the notation from Patel, Rodi and Scheuerer : f1 is used to increase production of dissipation rate; f2 is used to decrease destruction of dissipation rate; this two functions (which have nothing to do with the distance from the wall) are needed because of the proximity of the energetic scales with the dissipatives scales : at low Re number, real production (I mean production of k) occurs in the dissipative scales, which increase the dissipation rate; at low Re number, dissipation occurs at energetic scales (without energy cascade K41), which increase the dissipation rate "effect". The latest function f_nu is needed to damped the viscosity in the vicinity of the wall. This is the less physical part of this kind of models. In fact, turbulence does not decrease as much as lowRe keps models try to make us believe. At the opposite, real turbulence is far to be negligeable near the wall, BUT, its effect on the mean velocity is negligeable since in this region, turbulence acts on directions parallel to the wall. So, this damping function is determined to reach the value of one at the correct y+. This correct y+ is more or less 30, at the begining of the loglaw region. If now, we change this last function to make it reach the value of one sooner, let say y+=10, then the loglow region will be reached sooner, and the constant part of the loglaw will be changed (decreased). Which is more or less the effect of rough wall. So you can adjust your lowRe keps model to rough wall. 

July 16, 2003, 10:44 
Re: Wall Function  Correct me if I am wrong

#10 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi,
Maybe you can find this paper interesting: Patel V.C., 1995, "Application of Turbulence Models to Separated Flow Over Rough Surfaces", ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol 117, pp. 234241. Gorka 

July 16, 2003, 13:26 
Thank you

#11 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thank you all for the information


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
channelFoam for a 3D pipe  AlmostSurelyRob  OpenFOAM  3  June 24, 2011 13:06 
Error with Wmake  skabilan  OpenFOAM Installation  3  July 28, 2009 00:35 
OpenFoam 14 installation problem  gfcoppola  OpenFOAM Installation  20  November 2, 2007 14:38 
Axisymmetrical mesh  Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing)  OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh  10  April 2, 2007 14:00 
Wall function in adverse pressure gradients  stephane baralon  Main CFD Forum  11  September 2, 1999 04:05 