# superheated wet steam (avoid condensation in a nozzle)

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

August 12, 2009, 02:37
superheated wet steam (avoid condensation in a nozzle)
#1
Member

Ralf Schmidt
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 10
Hi!

I would like to simulate the steam flow in a flow nozzle for mass flow measurement (differential pressure method).

The aim is:

1.: to determine the minimum superheat of the steam, that condensation due to the pressure drop in the nozzle is avoided.

2.: To estimate the error in mass flow measurement, when superheat is to low and condensation in the nozzle occurs.

Has someone done something similar? Are there any experimental or numerical literature data to compare results?

The flow is NOT sonic and NOT transonic!!!

Thank You!
Ralf
Attached Images
 nozzle.JPG (18.8 KB, 11 views)
__________________
CFD - nothing but Colourful Fluid Dynamics

 August 12, 2009, 16:18 #2 New Member   Rich Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Montrose, Colorado, USA Posts: 11 Rep Power: 10 Ralf: > 1.: to determine the minimum superheat of the steam, that >condensation due to the pressure drop in the nozzle is avoided. If you know the inlet and outlet pressures, you can use the closed-form equations for quasi-one-dimensional nozzle flow. Using R and gamma for steam, you can start at the nozzle exit, using the temperature that will cause condensation at that pressure, and then work backwards to the inlet. I'd estimate that it's a half-page calculation. >2.: To estimate the error in mass flow measurement, when superheat >is to low and condensation in the nozzle occurs. That would probably require a multi-species simulation of quasi-one-dimensional flow using both steam and water. You would have one equation specifying the rate of evolution of water and disolution of steam. That equation would feed the two continuity equations, providing for loss of mass in the steam equation and gain of mass in the water equation. Since water will condense out and no longer be part of the flow, you could probably get away with not having a momentum equation for the water. Regards, Rich

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Ralf Schmidt FLUENT 0 August 11, 2009 11:55 Adam CFX 4 January 19, 2009 00:15 Arijit Ganguli CFX 0 June 5, 2007 10:18 d.vamsidhar FLUENT 0 November 24, 2005 02:45 BN SIMLOO Siemens 1 September 9, 2004 10:11

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50.