|January 13, 2010, 02:40||
Research work references
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 50Rep Power: 9
We have got plenty of CFD softwares to collect data for our research. Is it customary to give reference to the software that we are using? Because many publications dont inlcude details about software that they have used. What is the convention used?
Thanks in anticipation
|January 13, 2010, 10:00||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United States
Blog Entries: 2Rep Power: 10
Definitely one has to make sure he/she does include the software code used in the runs. This is because, although the fundamental eqns, assumptions may be universal, implementation of the terms are different in each code. This, tthey do so, in order to get robust stable solutions. Now, there are a number of ways to implement a term into the CFD code and hence, each has its own merits de-merits..so its better to say you used x software and obtained y result ..but with another z software you obtained "similar" but not the same result ...
It then becomes clear to readers what you have done and what is possible with the code you are mentioning.
in the journals, people do have to include the name of the code its more important..and if they have their own code utilized, they should have validated the code earlier and add the reference or provide validation of their code to simple problems within the article. This ensures that the code is acceptable to the standards.
Hope this helps.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Why Fluent does not work on Linux?||pzyss||FLUENT||19||February 2, 2013 03:38|
|Fluent side work||BJ||FLUENT||0||June 23, 2006 16:48|
|Gambit.exe didn't work!||Joshua||FLUENT||2||March 25, 2005 20:17|
|NEED the bibliographical references for CFD modellin in libre surface||Juan Carlos GARCIA SALAS||Main CFD Forum||0||October 8, 1999 04:13|
|Research associate in US or UK?||Liu||Main CFD Forum||0||July 30, 1998 07:27|