|April 29, 2010, 20:03||
SYSNOISE vs. CAA++
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 93Rep Power: 9
Which one is better, more accurate, most used, etc.?
And specifically, if one is interested in looking at propeller/turbine and airframe/wing interaction aeroacoustics, which code gives the most reliable results?
I've read the brochures, papers, and the claims to superiority. I would like to know what users and colleagues of users of either of these aeroacoustics codes or any other code for that matter think.
|aeroacoustics, caa++, noise, propeller, sysnoise|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise||Wieland||FLUENT||2||April 15, 2012 06:28|
|STARCCM+ and SYSNOISE||nomad||STAR-CCM+||0||April 29, 2010 19:54|
|sysnoise pricing||Alex||Main CFD Forum||0||January 14, 2008 18:18|
|STAR CD CAA Partner||tootoon||CD-adapco||10||July 8, 2007 07:25|
|computational aeroacoustic (CAA)||ricklee||Main CFD Forum||1||September 14, 2006 11:08|