CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum


Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 29, 2010, 21:03
Default SYSNOISE vs. CAA++
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 14
nomad is on a distinguished road
Which one is better, more accurate, most used, etc.?

And specifically, if one is interested in looking at propeller/turbine and airframe/wing interaction aeroacoustics, which code gives the most reliable results?

I've read the brochures, papers, and the claims to superiority. I would like to know what users and colleagues of users of either of these aeroacoustics codes or any other code for that matter think.

nomad is offline   Reply With Quote


aeroacoustics, caa++, noise, propeller, sysnoise

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise Wieland FLUENT 2 April 15, 2012 07:28
STARCCM+ and SYSNOISE nomad STAR-CCM+ 0 April 29, 2010 20:54
sysnoise pricing Alex Main CFD Forum 0 January 14, 2008 18:18
STAR CD CAA Partner tootoon Siemens 10 July 8, 2007 08:25
computational aeroacoustic (CAA) ricklee Main CFD Forum 1 September 14, 2006 12:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:15.