|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
John
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Which one is better, more accurate, most used, etc.?
And specifically, if one is interested in looking at propeller/turbine and airframe/wing interaction aeroacoustics, which code gives the most reliable results? I've read the brochures, papers, and the claims to superiority. I would like to know what users and colleagues of users of either of these aeroacoustics codes or any other code for that matter think. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| aeroacoustics, caa++, noise, propeller, sysnoise |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise | Wieland | FLUENT | 2 | April 15, 2012 07:28 |
| STARCCM+ and SYSNOISE | nomad | STAR-CCM+ | 0 | April 29, 2010 20:54 |
| sysnoise pricing | Alex | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 14, 2008 18:18 |
| STAR CD CAA Partner | tootoon | Siemens | 10 | July 8, 2007 08:25 |
| computational aeroacoustic (CAA) | ricklee | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 14, 2006 12:08 |