Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 27, 2004, 20:19 traditional driven cavity #1 Azfarizal Bin Mukhtar Guest   Posts: n/a hai... actually i'm University Teknologi Malaysia's student in last year. so right now i'm doing thesis about traditional driven cavity with different aspect ratio. i'm doing this thesis by use the program force 208(fortran compiler) so can anyone help me about what the effect can we get when using different aspect ratio and what the application can we get from that. For your knowledge my mesh is H=129 and L=129 (square cavity)

 July 28, 2004, 03:01 Re: traditional driven cavity #2 Maciej Matyka Guest   Posts: n/a Please see a paper about the SIMPLE/R - and Vorticity Stream approach with Driven Cavity benchmarks - available on my web page: "Solution to two-dimensional Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations with SIMPLE, SIMPLER and Vorticity-Stream Function Approaches. Driven-Lid Cavity Problem: Solution and Visualization.", Maciej Matyka , University of Linkoping, CFD Project Report #3, 30.VI.2004 Hope it will be helpful, Best Regards, Maciej Matyka http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/

 July 29, 2004, 18:49 Re: traditional driven cavity #3 jenn Guest   Posts: n/a It is alway puzzling to me why people always use two-dimensional simulation to replace three-dimensional case. Of course, the vorticity-streamfunction approach is very simple and less costly. But the physics is maybe very different? So why bothering use two-dimensional? For CFD beginner to practice, it is no harm. But for a real application, I doubt it. Anyone knows people do comparison work between the 2D case and 3D case? That will be very nice and convincing.

 August 4, 2004, 04:56 Re: traditional driven cavity #4 Maciej Matyka Guest   Posts: n/a Maybe the reason is, that on my Athlon 2.1 Ghz there is no possibility to run my code hundred times to check the results and clear all the mistakes in algorithm? I am using 2d cases just to finish the solver and then easly move it into 3d space. Also it is much easier to make efficient visualization for 2d case. And finally - there is a lot of benchmarks over the web for two dimensional codes. Best Regards, Maciej Matyka http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post illuminati5288 Main CFD Forum 0 August 12, 2011 22:05 gholamghar Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2010 01:55 debiao Main CFD Forum 2 January 11, 2006 14:14 Azfarizal B Mukhtar Main CFD Forum 0 August 12, 2004 10:26 Azfarizal b Mukhtar CFX 0 July 27, 2004 21:22

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:50.