|January 17, 2011, 10:06||
FVM in 1-D spherical coordinates
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118Rep Power: 9
I'm trying to obtain discretised equations in 1-D using FVM. It seems to me that there are two ways of doing it,
1) Firstly for the general momentum equation written in vector form (including divergence operators) I apply FVM (i.e. integrate over a control-volume and apply Gauss's theorem). I then write the resulting equation in 1-D spherical coordinates.
2) I write the momentum equation in 1-D spherical coordinates and I have extra geometric source terms compared with the Cartesian case. I then apply FVM (integrate over the volume). This is actually more like finite difference method.
I find the difference between the two discretisation is the extra geometric source terms. I'm not sure which method is more correct but I thought that in 1-D both FVM and finite-difference should yeild the same discretisation. Could anyone suggest which method is best?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Spherical coordinates in Fluent||orland||FLUENT||0||November 18, 2010 04:22|
|Advection in spherical coordinates?||lost.identity||Main CFD Forum||0||October 11, 2010 12:03|
|k-epsilon model in spherical coordinates||lost.identity||Main CFD Forum||0||March 15, 2010 08:34|
|FVM using Cylindrical coordinates||RameshK||Main CFD Forum||0||December 29, 2009 01:59|
|Laplace in spherical coordinates||Harini||CFX||2||December 6, 2007 17:35|