|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
I'm trying to obtain discretised equations in 1-D using FVM. It seems to me that there are two ways of doing it,
1) Firstly for the general momentum equation written in vector form (including divergence operators) I apply FVM (i.e. integrate over a control-volume and apply Gauss's theorem). I then write the resulting equation in 1-D spherical coordinates. 2) I write the momentum equation in 1-D spherical coordinates and I have extra geometric source terms compared with the Cartesian case. I then apply FVM (integrate over the volume). This is actually more like finite difference method. I find the difference between the two discretisation is the extra geometric source terms. I'm not sure which method is more correct but I thought that in 1-D both FVM and finite-difference should yeild the same discretisation. Could anyone suggest which method is best? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Spherical coordinates in Fluent | orland | FLUENT | 0 | November 18, 2010 04:22 |
| Advection in spherical coordinates? | lost.identity | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 11, 2010 13:03 |
| k-epsilon model in spherical coordinates | lost.identity | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 15, 2010 08:34 |
| FVM using Cylindrical coordinates | RameshK | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 29, 2009 01:59 |
| Laplace in spherical coordinates | Harini | CFX | 2 | December 6, 2007 17:35 |