CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

RSTM Implimentation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 14, 2005, 16:54
Default RSTM Implimentation
M. Choi
Posts: n/a
Hello, everyone. I'm now validating the Reynolds Stress Turbulence Model with experimental values of 2-D Channel. I got similar results in the velocity profile comparison to the experiment. But, in the wall-law, viscous sublayer is not properly predicted. This means that the range of the linear part(u+ = y+) is so small such as from 1 to 4. Typically, this linear part expands from 1 to nearly 8. I need some suggestions and advises to fix this one.

cf) 1. The y+ of the first grid from the wall is equal to near 1. 2. The first-order upwind scheme is used for inviscid flux terms. 3. The wall damping function(Not wall function) is used in the pressure-strain correlation. 4. The reynolds stress term is added by the source term in RANS equations.

Thank you in advance.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2005, 04:52
Default Re: RSTM Implimentation
Posts: n/a
Is this a low Reynolds number RST model? Is the test case fully developed channel flow at what Reynolds number?

(1) y+ < 1 is more usual but y+ = 1 is likely to be OK.

(2) Not relevant for fully developed flow because zero in the cross stream direction and constant in streamwise direction.

(3) There are several damping functions. Changing the type or the exponent to get a better match is quite a common trick.

(4) Not relevant to the answer you get unless instability prevents this.

Generally, RST models have lots of parameters that can be tuned to improve the fit to a particular experiment. Unfortunately, problems tend to come when one tries to find a general set of parameters.

If you are not getting the expected behaviour it may be wise to compare against the original predictions of the author of your particular RST model before comparing against experiments. If the original predictions show the same behaviour then you can have confidence in your implementation and concentrate on modifying the parameters to fit your purposes.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2005, 11:36
Default Re: RSTM Implimentation
M. Choi
Posts: n/a
Thanks andy for your comments!!! I will try it. ^^
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low-Re (full RSTM or analytical RSTM) turbulence model volker OpenFOAM 3 November 16, 2010 05:54
LRR Rstm pipe flow takes too long to get fully developed kjetil OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 13, 2010 12:26
Boundary conditions for RSTM alex_c OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 March 13, 2007 05:49
Gas flow in cyclone trouble with Launder Gibson RSTM andras OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 4, 2006 04:56
RSTM convergence issues nazario Main CFD Forum 0 June 23, 2006 07:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29.