Flow Result Accuracy

wildabyss · February 22, 2012, 10:53

I was performing turbulent flow modeling with Fluent on an untapered rectangular wing with an aspect ratio of 6.6, at an Re of approximately 1e6. The airfoil is NACA0015. I used the S-A turbulence model with low-Re correction.

I performed validation using a VLM solver (AVL) for lift, moment and induced drag, and the fully turbulent flat plate solution for skin friction drag. As can be seen from the plots, the CL and CD agree pretty well. How come the CM is more than 3 times off?

Martin Hegedus · February 22, 2012, 16:25

Cm is always tricky, and the hardest, to compare.

One of the better metrics is to calculate the error in the center of pressure or aerodynamic center, in your case, dxac = (cm1-cm2)/cl = (3.25e-2-1.0e-2)/1.0 = 2.25e-2. So your aerodynamic center is off by 2.25 percent of the chord. (Assuming your reference length is the chord length) This is to be expected.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out	saii	CFX	12	March 19, 2018 05:21
Flow meter Design	CD adapco Group Marketing	Siemens	3	June 21, 2011 08:33
reversed flow at velocity inlet / mass flow inlet	ib	FLUENT	1	March 26, 2007 13:11
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows?	diaw	Main CFD Forum	104	February 16, 2006 05:44
Cavity air flow with radiation – result variable	Yingchun	CFX	1	November 25, 2005 11:13

February 22, 2012, 16:25		#2
Martin Hegedus Senior Member Martin Hegedus Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 500 Rep Power: 19	Cm is always tricky, and the hardest, to compare. One of the better metrics is to calculate the error in the center of pressure or aerodynamic center, in your case, dxac = (cm1-cm2)/cl = (3.25e-2-1.0e-2)/1.0 = 2.25e-2. So your aerodynamic center is off by 2.25 percent of the chord. (Assuming your reference length is the chord length) This is to be expected.