|
[Sponsors] |
September 3, 2005, 05:38 |
urgent please...Hypermesh Vs Gridgen
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, Can someone compare the utility of Hypermesh and Gridgen for preprocessing please.. Their advantages and disadvantages..... Which one goes best for CFD.. Cheers
|
|
September 13, 2005, 11:57 |
Re: urgent please...Hypermesh Vs Gridgen
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mr Endee,
I believe Gridgen is much better compared to Hypermesh so many reasons. Firstly, you can use your geometry straight away in Gridgen - no cleaning up of surfaces what so ever and secondly the hyperbolic mesh extrusion will blow up your minds! its that good. Oh, one more thing - Gridgen is used my almost every aerospace company. Why, because the quality grids it produces gives quality answers. Hope this helped. Many thanks. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to import NACA 0012 Profile in Gridgen | maplepink | Main CFD Forum | 17 | May 7, 2013 13:01 |
Hypermesh file to Fluent | Logesh | FLUENT | 1 | November 30, 2011 13:46 |
Urgent Problem with Hypermesh and CFX | Luk | CFX | 5 | March 14, 2008 04:59 |
Glyph command to close GRIDGEN? | chris | Pointwise & Gridgen | 2 | March 25, 2007 14:22 |
Gridgen question | vishwas | Pointwise & Gridgen | 2 | February 25, 2006 16:05 |