CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Community Contributions > OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction

d2dt2 and ddt versus time-varying boundary conditions

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 3, 2019, 05:01
Default d2dt2 and ddt versus time-varying boundary conditions
  #1
Super Moderator
 
bigphil's Avatar
 
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,089
Rep Power: 34
bigphil will become famous soon enoughbigphil will become famous soon enough
To publicly answer a question I received via email:

Question
Why can the d2dt2 and ddt be set to steady state and the boundary conditions be set with a time dependence?

Answer

In solid mechanics, we are often interested in quasi-static responses, where by quasi-static we mean than the solid is moving slow enough such that inertial effects are negligible and can be ignored.

If the governing equation (linear momentum) can be written in the form of Newton's second law (sum of F = ma) then for quasi-static analyses 'a' is zero and so we get (sum of F = 0). To achieve quasi-static in OpenFOAM, we set d2dt2 and ddt to "steadyState".

However, quasi-static analyses can still have time-varying boundary conditions e.g. a standard tensile test has time-varying boundary conditions but the inertial effects are negligible.

Hopefully, this makes sense.

Philip
bigphil is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29.