CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Community Contributions > OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction

[solids4Foam] How to calculate drag coeff when using solids4Foam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree18Likes
  • 1 Post By wyldckat
  • 2 Post By bigphil
  • 3 Post By amuzeshi
  • 1 Post By amuzeshi
  • 3 Post By bigphil
  • 2 Post By bigphil
  • 3 Post By amuzeshi
  • 1 Post By amuzeshi
  • 2 Post By Daniel_Khazaei

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 9, 2019, 05:34
Default How to calculate drag coeff when using solids4Foam
  #1
Senior Member
 
Ali Shayegh
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 10
amuzeshi is on a distinguished road
The question is: How to calculate drag coeff when using solids4Foam on foam-extend 4.0? OR
Why execFlowFunctionObjects doesn't recognize regions in an FSI problem?

I went thru these steps:

1- solving:
Code:
user@linux$ solids4Foam
2- adding this to the end of controlDict:
Code:
   forceCoeffs1
   {
        type            forceCoeffs;
        region              fluid;       
        libs            ("libforces.so");
        outputControl       timeStep;
        outputInterval      1;
        patches             (interface);
        pName               p;
        UName               U;
        rhoName             rhoInf;
        log                 true;
        rhoInf              1000;
        CofR                (0.5 0.1 0);
        dragDir     (1 0.0 0);
        magUInf     .2;
        lRef        .2;
        Aref        .04;
   }
3- executing this:
Code:
user@linux$ execFlowFunctionObjects
4- this error appears:
Code:
Create time

Create mesh for time = 0



--> FOAM FATAL ERROR: 
Cannot find file "points" in directory "constant/polyMesh"

    From function Time::findInstance(const fileName&, const word&, const IOobject::readOption)
    in file db/Time/findInstance.C at line 148.

FOAM exiting
The Question again:
Why execFlowFunctionObjects doesn't recognize regions in an FSI problem?

regards
Ali
amuzeshi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 9, 2019, 19:27
Default
  #2
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Quick answer: execFlowFunctionObjects was designed as a simply function objects execution application. It assumes that you used simpleFoam, pisoFoam or some other fluid flow solver.

Mmm... now that I think about it... inside which folder are you running that command?
amuzeshi likes this.
__________________
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2019, 13:23
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Ali Shayegh
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 10
amuzeshi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyldckat View Post
Quick answer: execFlowFunctionObjects was designed as a simply function objects execution application. It assumes that you used simpleFoam, pisoFoam or some other fluid flow solver.

Mmm... now that I think about it... inside which folder are you running that command?
inside the case folder as usual.
amuzeshi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2019, 05:58
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
bigphil's Avatar
 
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,089
Rep Power: 34
bigphil will become famous soon enoughbigphil will become famous soon enough
Hi Ali,

The function objects should work correctly when the solids4foam solver is running.

I do not have experience with execFlowFunctionObjects but possibly it does not work as expected when there are regions.

So one solution is to run your simulation again with the function objects included.

Philip
Daniel_Khazaei and amuzeshi like this.
bigphil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2019, 07:24
Default Access to solids4foam solver!!
  #5
New Member
 
Hamed
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12
Hamed1117 is on a distinguished road
Does anyone know how can i access to the solids4Foam solver ?
Hamed1117 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2019, 09:29
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Ali Shayegh
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 10
amuzeshi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
Does anyone know how can i access to the solids4Foam solver ?
Hi Hamed,
Read this post.
amuzeshi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2019, 15:20
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Hamed
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12
Hamed1117 is on a distinguished road
Thank you Ali,
Dr Philip was very supportive in this field,
Hamed1117 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2019, 09:20
Default solids4Foam for neoHookeanElastic model
  #8
New Member
 
Hamed
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12
Hamed1117 is on a distinguished road
I am trying to use neoHookeanElastic model for FSI case of blood flow and living tissues interaction.

The FSI case consists of hyper-elastic Venous valves inside a blood vessel which demands the poisson`s ratio ~0.49 and Young M ~ 2e6.

The problem, however, is that for poisson`s ratio > 0.49, the solid part needs a very small time step (~1e-6) with many FSI iteration numbers(~35-40 iterations), and for higher time steps I got the following error :

From function void Foam::neoHookeanElastic::correct(surfaceSymmTensor Field& sigma) in filematerialModels/mechanicalModel/mechanicalLaws/nonLinearGeometryLaws/neoHookeanElastic/neoHookeanElastic.C at line 401-Material linearity enforced for stability!

mesh and geometry are attached,

thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FSI.jpg (118.4 KB, 44 views)
Hamed1117 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2019, 12:44
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Ali Shayegh
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 10
amuzeshi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
From function void Foam::neoHookeanElastic::correct(surfaceSymmTensor Field& sigma) in filematerialModels/mechanicalModel/mechanicalLaws/nonLinearGeometryLaws/neoHookeanElastic/neoHookeanElastic.C at line 401-Material linearity enforced for stability!
Hi,
Are you sure that it is an error? Isn't it only a warning?
Try these steps and see what happens:
  • In system/controlDict, turn on adjustableTimeStep
  • Use 1e-3 as absolute residual criteria for solid, fluid and outer fsi loop (By this, you actually loose the accuracy, but the procedure goes faster).
  • Be sure that number of outer fsi loops are big enough that the residual is reached.
Best,
Ali
Hamed1117 likes this.
amuzeshi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2019, 11:14
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
bigphil's Avatar
 
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,089
Rep Power: 34
bigphil will become famous soon enoughbigphil will become famous soon enough
Hi Hamed,

Generally, the displacement-based approach taken by most of the solid models becomes very inefficient for large (>0.49) values of Poisson's ratio. Instead, a pressure-displacement approach may work better e.g. see Tukovic et al presentation at the OpenFOAM Workshop in Duisburg.

It may be sufficient for your work to assume a lower value.

Philip
bigphil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2019, 12:47
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Hamed
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12
Hamed1117 is on a distinguished road
Hi Dr. Philip and Mr Ali;

Considering my case (FSI on Venous valves interaction with blood flow), I thought the problem was more about the wrong Poisson`s ratio and Young`s Modulus, but after trying many different values for mechanical properties, I have the same deviation around the interfaces even if I use a very fine mesh.

I just made a few clarifying pictures to give you a better understanding of the problem. I would like to share my log file as well.

I would also like to share my case in a private email.

Thanks again for your kind supports.
-------
Hamed
Code:
Time = 0.01017

Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (3.15809e-06 1.50563e-06 0.000304074)
Total force (solid) = (-3.15261e-06 -1.55435e-06 -0.000303831)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 1
Corr 176, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 0.00892703, Final residual = 9.71689e-10, No outer iterations = 176
 Max relative residual = 1, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 1
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00905615

Time = 0.01017, iteration: 1
Modes before clean-up : 2, modes after clean-up : 0
Current fsi under-relaxation factor: 0.4
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 0.0425372
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.222616, Final residual = 4.21496e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.270774, Final residual = 4.8607e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.264161, Final residual = 5.66204e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.000258033, Final residual = 4.30003e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.000296835, Final residual = 6.00212e-07, No Iterations 3
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.000198566, Final residual = 6.33282e-07, No Iterations 3
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 9.5329e-06 max: 0.0108989 velocity magnitude: 0.0104209
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.00371237, Final residual = 3.04198e-09, No Iterations 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00618749, Final residual = 1.04728e-08, No Iterations 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.000905929, Final residual = 4.20485e-08, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818183, Final residual = 2.64753e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -9.23974e+15 max: 3.28545e+24 average: 1.19418e+18
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.00460888, Final residual = 5.78919e-17, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -0.000151413 max: 0.015 average: 5.93991e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 9.75781e-05, Final residual = 5.98661e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.000527519, Final residual = 1.15841e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 2.24534e-05, Final residual = 9.54317e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818183, Final residual = 3.29049e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -2.72772e+23 max: 3.28545e+23 average: 3.25659e+16
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.000695647, Final residual = 1.98929e-15, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -0.00010531 max: 0.015 average: 5.68596e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 4.75273e-06, Final residual = 6.29318e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 4.45566e-05, Final residual = 2.31057e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 4.86859e-07, Final residual = 6.83051e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.80484, Final residual = 3.6083e-14, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -2.72756e+23 max: 3.4008e+28 average: 4.77861e+22
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.00500811, Final residual = 9.96427e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -0.000209318 max: 0.015 average: 5.55772e-06
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (-1.98948e-05 7.8638e-06 -0.000362569)
Total force (solid) = (1.9937e-05 -7.83634e-06 0.000362261)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 0.00919203
Corr 205, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 1.87231e-05, Final residual = 9.35021e-10, No outer iterations = 205
 Max relative residual = 0.00919203, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.583811
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00528709

Time = 0.01017, iteration: 2
Current fsi under-relaxation factor: 0.4
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 0.0210691
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.315873, Final residual = 4.74294e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.270807, Final residual = 5.04984e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.354676, Final residual = 6.70532e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.000507906, Final residual = 8.95989e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.000569547, Final residual = 9.80743e-07, No Iterations 3
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.000391171, Final residual = 4.48252e-07, No Iterations 4
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 4.31343e-05 max: 0.0413164 velocity magnitude: 0.0435732
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.00158777, Final residual = 4.76985e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00285384, Final residual = 7.03318e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.000370663, Final residual = 1.23296e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818186, Final residual = 4.27636e-17, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -4.08304e+21 max: 1.01271e+31 average: 3.65249e+24
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.00586598, Final residual = 1.50905e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.97979e-05 max: 0.015 average: 5.56469e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.59655e-05, Final residual = 3.79946e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00022598, Final residual = 3.3595e-10, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1.53249e-05, Final residual = 5.1753e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 5.44098e-18, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -3.61419e+21 max: 1.57421e+32 average: 4.37714e+25
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.0103825, Final residual = 5.63978e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -0.000190138 max: 0.015 average: 5.64058e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1.67418e-06, Final residual = 2.62571e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1.59293e-05, Final residual = 1.18784e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1.81971e-07, Final residual = 1.48228e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 3.2336e-24, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -6.09275e+19 max: 1.57421e+31 average: 4.37718e+24
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.0010865, Final residual = 1.08661e-20, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.54083e-05 max: 0.015 average: 5.72519e-06
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (-1.15638e-05 6.02827e-06 -0.000108811)
Total force (solid) = (1.15939e-05 -6.02873e-06 0.000108703)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 0.00322152
Corr 181, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 7.02616e-06, Final residual = 9.29248e-10, No outer iterations = 181
 Max relative residual = 0.00322152, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.355936
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00322341

Time = 0.01017, iteration: 3
Current fsi under-relaxation factor: 0.4
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 0.0140569
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.216827, Final residual = 4.26478e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.233153, Final residual = 4.05695e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.262137, Final residual = 6.55199e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.00039729, Final residual = 6.83797e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.000435475, Final residual = 9.13487e-07, No Iterations 3
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.000298678, Final residual = 9.80874e-07, No Iterations 3
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 6.52255e-05 max: 0.0624469 velocity magnitude: 0.0644917
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.00102315, Final residual = 3.06738e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00181026, Final residual = 4.56335e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.000236891, Final residual = 8.55743e-10, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 5.52221e-21, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -2.11844e+19 max: 1.57421e+30 average: 4.37749e+23
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.000107267, Final residual = 7.97726e-21, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -0.000184072 max: 0.015 average: 5.79673e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 6.79402e-05, Final residual = 2.47819e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.000167144, Final residual = 7.40024e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1.62238e-05, Final residual = 5.02729e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 2.56549e-22, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -7.13393e+16 max: 1.57421e+29 average: 4.37756e+22
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 1.05613e-05, Final residual = 5.23528e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.35123e-05 max: 0.015 average: 5.85367e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1.46828e-06, Final residual = 1.7557e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1.04925e-05, Final residual = 8.30899e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1.54619e-07, Final residual = 1.43036e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 1.9311e-25, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -1.12498e+17 max: 1.57421e+28 average: 4.37757e+21
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 1.06261e-06, Final residual = 1.94168e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -0.000181998 max: 0.015 average: 5.85814e-06
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (-6.03001e-06 4.56216e-06 5.01522e-05)
Total force (solid) = (6.05143e-06 -4.58066e-06 -5.01309e-05)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 0.00210744
Corr 165, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 4.53395e-06, Final residual = 9.37221e-10, No outer iterations = 165
 Max relative residual = 0.00210744, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.21737
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00196853

Time = 0.01017, iteration: 4
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 0.0287208
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.314755, Final residual = 4.90975e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.241241, Final residual = 4.9491e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.311435, Final residual = 6.78914e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.0002758, Final residual = 4.3074e-07, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.000364454, Final residual = 5.55956e-07, No Iterations 3
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.000200587, Final residual = 5.72831e-07, No Iterations 3
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 9.72781e-05 max: 0.10969 velocity magnitude: 0.103467
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.0016107, Final residual = 5.23428e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00291538, Final residual = 7.58568e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.000372498, Final residual = 1.40193e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 1.08359e-20, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -1.1239e+17 max: 1.57421e+27 average: 4.37759e+20
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 1.24894e-07, Final residual = 4.15435e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.22965e-05 max: 0.015 average: 5.85003e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.99254e-05, Final residual = 3.57822e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00025004, Final residual = 3.48847e-10, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 2.16671e-05, Final residual = 7.66342e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 4.82041e-22, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -5.78925e+19 max: 1.57421e+26 average: 4.37772e+19
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 3.04347e-07, Final residual = 4.40905e-19, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -0.000181325 max: 0.015 average: 5.84395e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 2.12102e-06, Final residual = 2.63592e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1.45785e-05, Final residual = 1.23879e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 2.14644e-07, Final residual = 3.48884e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.818182, Final residual = 6.59323e-24, No Iterations 1
bounding omega, min: -8.06657e+18 max: 1.57421e+25 average: 8.07092e+18
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.000808425, Final residual = 1.79874e-17, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.15315e-05 max: 0.015 average: 5.79382e-06
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (3.08443e-06 9.89652e-07 0.000301391)
Total force (solid) = (-3.07871e-06 -1.03661e-06 -0.000301147)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 0.0040934
Corr 181, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 7.08595e-06, Final residual = 9.98638e-10, No outer iterations = 181
 Max relative residual = 0.0040934, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.000747883
Alternative fsi residual: 6.77294e-06
ExecutionTime = 114663 s  ClockTime = 114673 s

forces output:
    forces(pressure, viscous)((0 0 0) (2.92363e-07 9.41523e-08 2.84259e-05))
    moment(pressure, viscous)((0 0 0) (-2.8342e-06 1.40024e-05 -1.36377e-08))

Time = 0.01018

Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (3.08443e-06 9.89652e-07 0.000301391)
Total force (solid) = (-3.07871e-06 -1.03661e-06 -0.000301147)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 1
Corr 178, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 0.008752, Final residual = 9.17236e-10, No outer iterations = 178
 Max relative residual = 1, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 1
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00907011
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Doc2_compressed (1).pdf (184.5 KB, 18 views)
Hamed1117 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2019, 12:09
Default
  #12
Super Moderator
 
bigphil's Avatar
 
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,089
Rep Power: 34
bigphil will become famous soon enoughbigphil will become famous soon enough
Hi Hamed,

Does the gap become smaller as the FSI tolerance is tightened? Or alternatively, does it become larger as the FSI tolerance is loosened?

It looks like your mesh is conformal; is that true? In that case, you can use the directMap approached instead of the GGI; you could also try RBF. Both are implemented in solids4foam.

Philip
Daniel_Khazaei and Hamed1117 like this.
bigphil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2019, 14:33
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Ali Shayegh
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 10
amuzeshi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
Hi Dr. Philip and Mr Ali;

Considering my case (FSI on Venous valves interaction with blood flow), I thought the problem was more about the wrong Poisson`s ratio and Young`s Modulus, but
....
Dear Hamed,
As I see infinity values in your omega field, it seems that your fluid flow is not solved properly. What do you think?
I suggest trying this simulation to solve only fluid and not interaction first. You can
do this by turning off fsi in :
Code:
constant/fsiProperties
and then see what happens...
amuzeshi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2019, 11:26
Default
  #14
New Member
 
Hamed
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12
Hamed1117 is on a distinguished road
Dear Ali,

First, you’re right. The solver is getting problem with the omega field, that’s why the bounding term came in. This problem can be solved if I use fixed value velocity through inlet instead of being required to use time series velocity.
Second, following your suggestions, I just reduce the Tolerance for the FSI loop within each time-step from 1e-6 to 1e-3, and the solver takes a few quick iterations for convergence, and that’s much better right now. But, the deviation in between the interfaces is getting larger, and I hope that would be its maximum value.

Dear Philip,
If you mean the interfaces deviation gap, the time series velocity profile seems to be related problem as well. I don’t have that much deviation gap when I use fixed value velocity at the inlet patch.
I feel that the solver doesn’t work fine with some time series velocity BC.
Regarding the Method for transferring information between the interfaces, direct map approach doesn’t work well even if use a very fined conformal mesh created by ICEM CFD block structured approach. Plus, RBF works much better than GGI.

In sum, as I mentioned before, the procedure sounds to be much better now, but the deviation gap is widening over time, and I think this is becuase the FSI tolerance (1e-3) is too much. Lower FSI tolerance (1e-6), however, demands many iterations.
The other confusing point is that the current time step is 1e-5 with 0.0034 Co number, but if I take it 2-3 times bigger, the solver simply crashes.
Furthermore, the inlet patch is far from the FSI interface at the beginning, and it should take some time for flow field to reach there. But, the interface starts to move short after the start time.

Regards
Hamed

Code:
Time = 0.00718

Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (-2.33377e-08 -3.01451e-07 1.21318e-05)
Total force (solid) = (2.15632e-08 3.02419e-07 -1.21189e-05)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 1
Corr 242, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 0.00284558, Final residual = 9.3859e-10, No outer iterations = 242
 Max relative residual = 1, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 1
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00234895

Time = 0.00718, iteration: 1
Modes before clean-up : 2, modes after clean-up : 0
Current fsi under-relaxation factor: 0.05
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 4.10358e-05
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.840076, Final residual = 2.39959e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.846326, Final residual = 8.91448e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.888646, Final residual = 9.87733e-07, No Iterations 6
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.320706, Final residual = 7.29239e-07, No Iterations 8
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.483341, Final residual = 9.35381e-07, No Iterations 9
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.329802, Final residual = 5.32541e-07, No Iterations 8
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 1.1378e-06 max: 0.0038489 velocity magnitude: 0.100049
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.000822067, Final residual = 2.49849e-10, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.000776971, Final residual = 3.60458e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.000224024, Final residual = 1.25943e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 1.05632e-05, Final residual = 3.48389e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.000398424, Final residual = 2.46952e-07, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.52414e-10 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947244
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1.07711e-05, Final residual = 4.34146e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1.41384e-05, Final residual = 8.04891e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 3.48485e-07, Final residual = 3.49716e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 1.06643e-06, Final residual = 4.72058e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.08304e-05, Final residual = 2.89133e-08, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -3.43264e-11 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947211
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 4.595e-08, Final residual = 3.15598e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 5.08656e-08, Final residual = 4.0114e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 3.0592e-09, Final residual = 3.30954e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 1.0566e-07, Final residual = 5.76603e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.18618e-06, Final residual = 3.45449e-09, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.51751e-10 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947208
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (9.58789e-09 2.0536e-07 2.23259e-06)
Total force (solid) = (-9.05041e-09 -2.07311e-07 -2.22094e-06)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 0.00108072
Corr 177, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 4.66104e-06, Final residual = 9.87664e-10, No outer iterations = 177
 Max relative residual = 0.00108072, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.946871
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00222415

Time = 0.00718, iteration: 2
Current fsi under-relaxation factor: 0.05
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 3.88777e-05
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.0600702, Final residual = 3.16851e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.0923394, Final residual = 7.79415e-07, No Iterations 8
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.0666684, Final residual = 4.59348e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.0131503, Final residual = 4.48109e-07, No Iterations 6
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.0288351, Final residual = 7.12569e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.0169817, Final residual = 7.17113e-07, No Iterations 6
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 9.25785e-07 max: 0.0038489 velocity magnitude: 0.100049
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.36956e-06, Final residual = 2.43038e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 7.197e-06, Final residual = 3.83537e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 9.13025e-08, Final residual = 7.72385e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 3.10613e-07, Final residual = 1.17103e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.74007e-07, Final residual = 3.76998e-10, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -2.57545e-12 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1.29491e-06, Final residual = 6.6442e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1.76408e-06, Final residual = 9.90313e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 3.96689e-08, Final residual = 4.08151e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 3.33405e-08, Final residual = 1.82678e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.8677e-08, Final residual = 5.0997e-11, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.52066e-10 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 2.60354e-09, Final residual = 3.21151e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 2.9883e-09, Final residual = 3.31592e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 7.88369e-11, Final residual = 7.39832e-14, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 3.23573e-09, Final residual = 2.22854e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 5.07204e-09, Final residual = 6.06171e-12, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -5.67284e-12 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (6.91648e-09 1.89368e-07 2.83362e-06)
Total force (solid) = (-6.47144e-09 -1.91187e-07 -2.82192e-06)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 6.13304e-05
Corr 83, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 2.70202e-07, Final residual = 9.67325e-10, No outer iterations = 83
 Max relative residual = 6.13304e-05, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.899692
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00211333

Time = 0.00718, iteration: 3
Current fsi under-relaxation factor: 0.05
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 3.69388e-05
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.0275252, Final residual = 7.98234e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.0292615, Final residual = 7.50964e-07, No Iterations 6
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.0303498, Final residual = 4.56572e-07, No Iterations 6
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.0027185, Final residual = 4.0568e-07, No Iterations 5
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.00533021, Final residual = 4.11815e-07, No Iterations 6
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.00351797, Final residual = 5.2661e-07, No Iterations 5
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 7.32008e-07 max: 0.0038489 velocity magnitude: 0.100049
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 8.14705e-06, Final residual = 2.29806e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 6.91261e-06, Final residual = 3.6221e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 8.75404e-08, Final residual = 7.03357e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 2.81286e-07, Final residual = 1.2101e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 6.49217e-08, Final residual = 4.47831e-11, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -7.58949e-10 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1.367e-06, Final residual = 5.53742e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1.57508e-06, Final residual = 9.00186e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 3.50923e-08, Final residual = 3.10754e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 2.99862e-08, Final residual = 1.82564e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 6.73838e-09, Final residual = 5.65891e-12, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.51795e-10 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 2.16595e-09, Final residual = 2.18187e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 2.64342e-09, Final residual = 3.20919e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 5.99663e-11, Final residual = 1.36567e-13, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 2.9135e-09, Final residual = 2.17967e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 6.94569e-10, Final residual = 6.58861e-13, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -7.58995e-10 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (3.96849e-09 1.69376e-07 3.41162e-06)
Total force (solid) = (-3.61189e-09 -1.71066e-07 -3.3999e-06)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 6.18627e-05
Corr 86, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 2.65482e-07, Final residual = 9.24092e-10, No outer iterations = 86
 Max relative residual = 6.18627e-05, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.854873
Alternative fsi residual: 0.00200806

Time = 0.00718, iteration: 4
Maximal accumulated displacement of interface points: 0.000703515
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.899139, Final residual = 3.14282e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.899561, Final residual = 7.76862e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.908687, Final residual = 2.81354e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.0274633, Final residual = 8.09574e-07, No Iterations 6
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.0409861, Final residual = 6.12213e-07, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.026483, Final residual = 4.1743e-07, No Iterations 6
Evolving fluid model: pimpleFluid
Courant Number mean: 3.48986e-06 max: 0.0038489 velocity magnitude: 0.100049
PIMPLE: iteration 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.000164904, Final residual = 4.44584e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.000137998, Final residual = 6.90704e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1.68687e-06, Final residual = 1.2523e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 2.7701e-06, Final residual = 8.76416e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 7.9778e-07, Final residual = 5.9646e-10, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -5.29395e-12 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
PIMPLE: iteration 2
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 4.63699e-05, Final residual = 1.05237e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 3.83718e-05, Final residual = 1.58858e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 5.43873e-07, Final residual = 2.87303e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 2.97631e-07, Final residual = 1.42784e-10, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 8.22545e-08, Final residual = 6.35442e-11, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -8.51511e-10 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
PIMPLE: iteration 3
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 3.5925e-08, Final residual = 2.57546e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 4.12395e-08, Final residual = 3.52182e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 6.36586e-10, Final residual = 4.37736e-12, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for omega, Initial residual = 2.89809e-08, Final residual = 1.54184e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 8.56864e-09, Final residual = 7.18223e-12, No Iterations 1
bounding k, min: -6.90639e-13 max: 0.0152085 average: 0.00947207
Setting traction on solid patch
Interpolating from fluid to solid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Total force (fluid) = (-2.53231e-08 -2.77636e-07 1.28999e-05)
Total force (solid) = (2.35382e-08 2.78443e-07 -1.28879e-05)
Evolving solid solver
Corr 0, relative residual = 0.00101833
Corr 175, relative residual = 0
PCG: Solving for D, Initial residual = 4.27465e-06, Final residual = 9.68254e-10, No outer iterations = 175
 Max relative residual = 0.00101833, Relative residual = 0, enforceLinear = false
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Interpolating from solid to fluid using GGI/AMI interpolation
Current fsi relative residual norm: 0.000862285
Alternative fsi residual: 2.02547e-06
ExecutionTime = 10730.1 s  ClockTime = 10731 s

forces output:
    forces(pressure, viscous)((0 0 0) (-2.39268e-09 -2.61921e-08 1.21742e-06))
    moment(pressure, viscous)((0 0 0) (-1.20252e-07 5.99465e-07 1.26537e-08))
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Capture23.jpg (36.6 KB, 19 views)
Hamed1117 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2019, 08:40
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Ali Shayegh
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 10
amuzeshi is on a distinguished road
Hi Hamed,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
...but the deviation gap is widening over time
Are you sure that it is not only a visualization problem? (Read this post.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
The other confusing point is that the current time step is 1e-5 with 0.0034 Co number, but ...
Have you turned on adjustableTimeStep in system/controlDict? This makes dT as big as possible based on maxCo entry which is also specified in system/controlDicrt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
Furthermore, the inlet patch is far from the FSI interface at the beginning, ...
If your initial velocity field (specified in 0/fluid/U.internalField) is not (0 0 0), then it is logical to see deformation right after the simulation starts.

Regards
Ali
Daniel_Khazaei likes this.
amuzeshi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2019, 12:50
Default
  #16
Senior Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Noshahr, Iran
Posts: 348
Rep Power: 21
Daniel_Khazaei will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
First, you’re right. The solver is getting problem with the omega field, that’s why the bounding term came in. This problem can be solved if I use fixed value velocity through inlet instead of being required to use time series velocity.
Hi,

Does your case run properly when you solve for the fluid only case? How this so called time dependent velocity is formulated for inlet? Is the velocity variation smooth enough to prevent velocity jump during simulation?

If you are not sure the fluid part is producing stable and accurate solution, then heading directly to the fsi case can drastically increase time to diagnose the actual reason behind this behavior.

From past I recall that one should use combined pulsatile pressure/velocity boundary condition at inlet and outlet to obtain physically correct results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
Second, following your suggestions, I just reduce the Tolerance for the FSI loop within each time-step from 1e-6 to 1e-3, and the solver takes a few quick iterations for convergence, and that’s much better right now. But, the deviation in between the interfaces is getting larger, and I hope that would be its maximum value.
Just be careful with loosening the fsi convergence tolerance!
You can do this when you are trying to determine the cause of instabilities but set it back to a tighter value when you are ready to run the final case.

As you have already observed, loosening the fsi tolerance may provide faster simulation but it also results in large gap between interfaces and your simulation will probably crash do the accumulation of errors. Specially in these cases as the simulation is strongly coupled with a low elastic modulus and density ratio ~ O(1).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
If you mean the interfaces deviation gap, the time series velocity profile seems to be related problem as well. I don’t have that much deviation gap when I use fixed value velocity at the inlet patch.
I feel that the solver doesn’t work fine with some time series velocity BC.
Well there is a time dependent BC already implemented within solids4Foam toolkit which suggest the should not be any problem with time dependent BCs on the solver side.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
In sum, as I mentioned before, the procedure sounds to be much better now, but the deviation gap is widening over time, and I think this is becuase the FSI tolerance (1e-3) is too much. Lower FSI tolerance (1e-6), however, demands many iterations.
Already answered this above, loosening fsi tolerance comes with a serious side effects. If you look into the HronTurekFsi3 tutorials, as strongly coupled case it needs 12-16 fsi iterations to converge in each time step and this is achieved by turning off the coupled switch which allow the fluid part to solve for a stable solution before starting to transfer the forces and receiving displacements.

One more thing, try setting pimple outer loop correction to 1 and see what happens.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamed1117 View Post
The other confusing point is that the current time step is 1e-5 with 0.0034 Co number, but if I take it 2-3 times bigger, the solver simply crashes.
Furthermore, the inlet patch is far from the FSI interface at the beginning, and it should take some time for flow field to reach there. But, the interface starts to move short after the start time.
Are you starting the simulation at rest?
What is the forces values being transferred to solid side at the beginning of the simulation before solving the fluid region?

I strongly suggest providing better initial condition for fluid region before starting a coupled solution.
If the velocity is pulsatile then run the fluid region for a single cycle before turning the coupled switch on.

Finally, why I don't see pressure equation getting solved in your log file?
It is just missing from the log or you are some how managed not to solve for it?


Regards,
D. Khazaei
bigphil and amuzeshi like this.
Daniel_Khazaei is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
drag coeff. alimea OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 November 20, 2017 08:45
How to calculate Cn (normal Drag Co-effiecient) and Ct (tangential drag co-efficient) amianjan FLUENT 0 February 12, 2014 02:00
Calculate Drag force for flat plate vsun FLUENT 0 October 3, 2010 07:56
How should we calculate the drag force ?? Thinnapong FLUENT 5 May 4, 2008 13:46
How to calculate the drag force? James CFX 1 April 24, 2008 00:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01.