CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Community Contributions

[swak4Foam] Problem with groovyTotalPressure

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   October 12, 2014, 11:25
Default Problem with groovyTotalPressure
  #1
New Member
 
towanda
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 11
towanda is on a distinguished road
Dear community of Foamers,
I am working with groovyTotalPressure BC. It works fine in several tests, but in some cases when I am trying to run parallelized cases, the evaluation of the "p0Expression" seems to fail.

I have made some tests and the: p0Expression "A+B+C..."; is well recognized by the BC, but the evaluation of that expression which takes place in line:

p0()=driver_.evaluate<scalar>(this->p0Expression_);

seems to fail when I am running in parallel with several processors.

For the case of interest regarding the number of processors, the patch where I am applying this BC is completly contained in the same domain.

At the moment, I am running out of ideas to see which could be the problem or in what manner can I understand/figure it out what is going on.


I will appreciate comments, ideas or some help


Best regards.

Last edited by towanda; October 15, 2014 at 14:44.
towanda is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UDF compiling problem Wouter Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 6 June 6, 2012 04:43
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem JFDC FLUENT 1 July 11, 2011 05:59
natural convection problem for a CHT problem Se-Hee CFX 2 June 10, 2007 06:29
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) ParodDav CFX 5 April 29, 2007 19:13
Is this problem well posed? Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 5 September 8, 1999 14:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:52.