|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
Hi all,
I’m facing some big issues about layer addiction with cfMesh on sharp edges. My geometry is quite simple; what is challenging me, they are the two 45° pipes inside the domain. As you may see by enclosed links, pipes are cut and sharp edges are present; small blu lines are skewFaces: skewness > 4.4 As you may see by following meshDict Code:
SurfaceFile "regionAirAmb.fms";
maxCellSize 0.002;
//minCellSize 0.001;
//boundaryCellSize 0.002;
/*
edgeMeshRefinement
{
edgeMesh1
{
edgeFile "edgeAmb1.vtk"; //sharp edges
cellSize 0.001;
}
}*/
/*
localRefinement
{
interAirSolido2 //near sharps edges
{
cellSize 0.001;
// refinementThickness 0.001;
}
interAirSolido3 //near sharps edges
{
cellSize 0.001;
// refinementThickness 0.001;
}
interAirSolido4 //near sharps edges
{
cellSize 0.0005;
// refinementThickness 0.001;
}
}*/
boundaryLayers
{
patchBoundaryLayers
{
"interAirSolido.*"
{
nLayers 5;
thicknessRatio 1.2;
// maxFirstLayerThickness 0.004;
// alllowDiscontinuity 1;
}
wallAirAmb
{
nLayers 5;
thicknessRatio 1.2;
// maxFirstLayerThickness 0.004;
// alllowDiscontinuity 1;
}
}
}
What I can say is: - distance between cut pipe and domain is approximately 2mm - if I set 2mm for minCellSize or boundaryCellSize, with nr.3 layers I can get a poor good mesh; - If I use increaseMeshQuality, with nr.3 layers I can get rid of problem faces, but layers are not so many then - if I increase the refinement up to 5e-4mm and 3 layers, I get a mesh with more skewFaces and nonOrthogoanlFaces. Then If I use 2mm for minCellSize or boundaryCellSize, with layers > 3 skewness and nonOrthogonality increase If with both of the upper settings I use increaseMeshQuality, I can’t get rid of the problem faces. So, the question is simple, what should I do? I meshed the stl by using Salome and all surface checks are positive. I also tried to increase the resolution of the cells on the problem edges, but no effects. What should I do? https://www.dropbox.com/s/blh0mc2zcrsrt86/stl.PNG?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/bhf00sq08z...eshed.PNG?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/bgdxhgwt70...Faces.PNG?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/blh0mc2zcrsrt86/stl.PNG?dl=0 stl file of the domain: https://www.dropbox.com/s/kzkr3w1ubd...irAmb.zip?dl=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Michael Alletto
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Bremen
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
hey hey,
did you find a solution? |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [snappyHexMesh] SHM: sharp edge resolving problem with explicit feature edges | piotr.mecht | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 21 | May 9, 2020 15:56 |
| [snappyHexMesh] Error snappyhexmesh - Multiple outside loops | avinashjagdale | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 53 | March 8, 2019 10:42 |
| [snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
| [snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
| Boundary layer meshing with sharp trailing edges | Andrew Berner | FLUENT | 1 | August 28, 2007 18:39 |