|
[Sponsors] |
[waves2Foam] Curious as to why wavelength is used as a recommended length |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 18, 2017, 01:41 |
Curious as to why wavelength is used as a recommended length
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi,
I have a question about the size of relaxation zones used in waves2foam. Typically I see recommendations of "about a wavelength" as a recommended length for the inlet zone and outlet zone (each), but why is this the case? What kind of error do you run into if you shrink the relaxation zones to be much smaller, say 50% or 10% or even 1% of a wavelength? How drastic are the effects if you approach the equivalent of a boundary inlet/outlet and try to make a relaxation "zone" just a few cells long? (I think OLAFOAM has a generation system a little like this, although using the boundary itself?) Thanks in advance for your time. I have looked around in literature but it's difficult to find practicalities like this, especially as people tend to publish what works rather than what breaks. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skewness , Minimum Edge Length and Mesh Quality in FLuent | ViLaks | FLUENT | 2 | March 2, 2017 05:57 |
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale | rizhang | CFX | 2 | April 22, 2016 07:22 |
Modelled Length Scale in SAS-SST Simulation | jego | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 16, 2016 06:45 |
DES Relative Length Scale in Fluent never positive, why? | ChezLeon | FLUENT | 1 | October 17, 2014 07:34 |
SixDoFRigidBodyMotion under OF2.3 ( self oscillating cylinder) | Scabbard | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | July 22, 2014 04:50 |