 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Fahlbeck et al - 2022 - A head loss pressure boundary condition |
6Likes
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 10, 2022, 11:23
|
Fahlbeck et al - 2022 - A head loss pressure boundary condition
|
#1 |
|
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,107
Rep Power: 35  |
Comments and questions are welcomed on the article Fahlbeck et al, A head loss pressure boundary condition for hydraulic systems, OpenFOAM Journal, January 2022, https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v2.69.
Last edited by bigphil; April 11, 2022 at 08:00. Reason: Paper published, and title slightly changed. Update link and date format |
|
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2022, 07:09
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Jonathan
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi everyone,
I am the main author of this publication and I will gladly answer any question you may have regarding the boundary condition or the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2022, 14:05
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Avdeev Evgeniy
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Togliatty, Russia
Posts: 69
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 22  |
Quote:
is your test case open and available to download and run? |
||
|
|
|
||
|
January 28, 2022, 01:21
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Jonathan
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Yes, a test case and the source code is available via the link posted by bigphil on the OpenFOAM journal website. Please let me know if you have any problems with downloading them, in that case I can send them to you instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2023, 04:42
|
|
#5 | |
|
New Member
Gino Parisella
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
how hard would it be to make it work for twoPhaseEulerFoam? is there any work already being done/initiated towards that? Limited to cases with small volume fractions of the dispersed phase (maybe <2-3%), I wonder whether it is still valid to prescribe loss(es) for the continuous phase only, or not--so impose headLossPressure BC for the continuous phase only? Typical application with such limitation would be air/water mixture in bubble/dispersed flow regime. Thank you in advance |
||
|
|
|
||
|
June 1, 2023, 10:07
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Jonathan
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi ginop,
We are not working with multiphase flow, so the simple answer is that I do not know. In principle it should be possible to use the boundary condition if you only have one phase present at the patch. With the current implementation the kinematic viscosity is taken as the average value on the patch, while the density (if not kinematic pressure is used) is multiplied on a face-by-face basis to the head losses. Please let me know if you have any success using the boundary condition with the twoPhaseEulerFoam solver. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 07:30 |
| Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation | MichaelK | CFX | 12 | September 1, 2016 05:15 |
| interFoam (HELYX-OS) pressure boundary conditions | SFr | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | June 23, 2016 16:36 |
| replacing of shock tube high pressure part with a boundary condition for low pressure | immortality | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 2, 2013 13:30 |
| Setting outlet Pressure boundary condition using CAFFA code | Mukund Pondkule | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 16, 2011 03:23 |
Linear Mode
