|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for airfoil 2D case: High computational effort for low quality mesh |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 15, 2013, 16:57 |
SnappyHexMesh for airfoil 2D case: High computational effort for low quality mesh
|
#1 |
New Member
Deutschland
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12 |
Good Evening,
using SnappyHexMesh for a 2D airfoil case, I encounter the following problem: short description: Snappy meshes in 3rd dimension and consumes high computational power, but after extrudeMesh, the mesh quality is low. In blockMesh, the patches "left" and "right" are set "empty", which should tell snappy to not mesh in the 3rd dimension - however, this is happening along the stl surface. The workaround to then generate a 2D mesh as described in the various threads here is to extrude one of the empty patches using extrudeMesh. In theory, this works. In practice, I have to generate a 20 million cells mesh with snappy to get 100000 cells after having used extrudeMesh. Is something wrong in this workflow, or is there actually some kind of bug in snappy that causes computational inefficiency ? platform: Ubuntu 12.10, OF 2.2.0 (also encountered the same problem on a OF 1.6 machine) Thank you very much for any help regarding this problem. case file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...nlineDB.tar.gz |
|
Tags |
meshing a 2d, snappyhexmesh 2d |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 05:38 |
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes | thomasnwalshiii | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 18 | December 19, 2015 18:57 |
[ANSYS Meshing] High quality unstructured hybrid mesh around ship | flinde | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | March 3, 2015 18:04 |
2d irregular grid | Remy | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 22, 2008 04:49 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 12:24 |