[snappyHexMesh] Snappy : Multi-region meshing

danvica · March 28, 2012, 07:12

@aurelien

That's all ? So simple ? I thought the common surfaces between two regions need to be meshed exactly the same way (same points)... actually I thought they were the same mesh named in two different ways.

@antonessiu
I think you can try lower your refinement level requirement.
In the sHMDict I posted yesterday the setup is quite coarse...

Daniele

Aurelien Thinat · March 28, 2012, 07:30

In "wonderfull land", you should use only structured mesh (the exact same surface mesh for both fluid region and solid region) to get the best results.

But in real life since I was not able to deal with SHM, an unstructured mesh is a first solution. If you use the same cell size for both regions, you will be able to limit the error from the meshes differences.

I have already checked OpenFOAM can deal with it on a simple test case. With SHM, The only problem that could appear is from the feature edge option. Sometimes SHM is a bit crafty. But with an other mesh tool, it would be easy.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How I can introduce my power heat (W) in chtMultiRegionFoam?	aminem	OpenFOAM Pre-Processing	32	August 29, 2019 02:23
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes	thomasnwalshiii	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	18	December 19, 2015 18:57
[snappyHexMesh] New multi region meshing tutorial with sHM	Tobi	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	0	November 24, 2014 17:42
[snappyHexMesh] Snappy. Mesh region between 2 concentric stls	be_inspired	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	3	May 20, 2014 13:21
[snappyHexMesh] How to generate geometry - multi region stl, obj	wersoe	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	0	June 1, 2013 03:02

March 28, 2012, 07:12		#61
danvica Senior Member Daniele Vicario Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Novara, Italy Posts: 142 Rep Power: 17	@aurelien That's all ? So simple ? I thought the common surfaces between two regions need to be meshed exactly the same way (same points)... actually I thought they were the same mesh named in two different ways. @antonessiu I think you can try lower your refinement level requirement. In the sHMDict I posted yesterday the setup is quite coarse... Daniele

March 28, 2012, 07:30		#62
Aurelien Thinat Senior Member Aurelien Thinat Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 165 Rep Power: 15	In "wonderfull land", you should use only structured mesh (the exact same surface mesh for both fluid region and solid region) to get the best results. But in real life since I was not able to deal with SHM, an unstructured mesh is a first solution. If you use the same cell size for both regions, you will be able to limit the error from the meshes differences. I have already checked OpenFOAM can deal with it on a simple test case. With SHM, The only problem that could appear is from the feature edge option. Sometimes SHM is a bit crafty. But with an other mesh tool, it would be easy.