Secondorder explicit treatment of buoyancy term

maka · April 19, 2006, 08:03

I need to treat buoyancy term (beta*alpha*(T-T0)) on momentum equation with a second order scheme. I looked at fvSchemes dictionary and I could not find label that treat terms with no derivative. I notice that once I change that momentum equation and do some adjustment, the code run well. My question: how did the code treat the buoyancy term? Can I treat in second-order way (Adams-Bashforth for example)? Thanks.

best regards,
Maka

maka · April 20, 2006, 07:42

refers to OpenFOAM V 1.2

hitzhwan · April 13, 2020, 18:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by maka

refers to OpenFOAM V 1.2

Excuse me， how can set Adams-Bashforth scheme in the fluent？

April 19, 2006, 08:03	I need to treat buoyancy term	#1
maka Senior Member Maka Mohu Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 305 Rep Power: 18	I need to treat buoyancy term (betaalpha(T-T0)) on momentum equation with a second order scheme. I looked at fvSchemes dictionary and I could not find label that treat terms with no derivative. I notice that once I change that momentum equation and do some adjustment, the code run well. My question: how did the code treat the buoyancy term? Can I treat in second-order way (Adams-Bashforth for example)? Thanks. best regards, Maka

April 20, 2006, 07:42	refers to OpenFOAM V 1.2	#2
maka Senior Member Maka Mohu Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 305 Rep Power: 18	refers to OpenFOAM V 1.2

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Implicit or explicit treatment of convective terms	CH	Main CFD Forum	1	March 14, 2007 07:51
[Q] Convection term treatment in UDS	Ryan, Lee	FLUENT	4	October 18, 2004 10:20
Problem Buoyancy Term	Andreas	Main CFD Forum	1	March 4, 2004 00:35
transient term treatment	Mike	Main CFD Forum	9	February 18, 2003 13:26
Treatment of Source Term in CE/SE	shinehwa	Main CFD Forum	1	February 6, 2002 21:38