CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

value of k for atmospheric wind

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   June 24, 2021, 15:10
Default value of k for atmospheric wind
  #1
New Member
 
Adrian Main
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
AdrianMm is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone. I am quite new to OpenFOAM and I would like to know if I could please get the advise from any of you related to the next topic:

A bit of context: I am running a Atmospheric Wind simulation, within the field of civil engineering, sort of what we do with wind tunnels tests. I have a structure imported from STL format, in the middle of a quadrilateral blockMesh and I am subjecting it to a wind. I have successfully snapped the geometry with SnappyHexMesh. I want to obtain surface pressures and pressure coefficients on my object (a building).

I am using simpleFoam to solve the model with realizableKE turbulent model. The boundary conditions are quite critical. I have used the ones from here, based on the paper from Hargreaves and Wright (2007):

https://develop.openfoam.com/Develop...ht_2007/0.orig

I have implemented these boundary conditions. Are they correct/advisable for my study? I had to cancel the “Top” wall shear since it was making my model to diverge but I don’t think this is critical. Is it?

I am experiencing some troubles to define the internalField value for “k”, in the “k” input file. My results are super sensitive to this input value and completely dependent on it (despite I thought this was just an initial setup and then the analysis is to work its way towards the right k it needs…). But no, it is critical to get this number right. From the equation k = friction velocity^2 / Cmu^0.5 I get a big number (k=8.57 obtained with rho=1.184, kappa=0.42, z0=0.03, zref=10 and Uref=22.2) leading to what I deem unrealistically huge vortices and very bad convergence. By trial and error I’ve found that the results I consider about-right are for an internalField close to k=0.1.

Can anyone make sense of all this? Which is the “k” I should be using (and why)?

Many thanks for your help. Adrian
AdrianMm is offline   Reply With Quote

 

Tags
atmboundarylayer, realizableke


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pitsco Airtech 40ic wind tunnel manual & software needed Q-Prof Main CFD Forum 2 May 15, 2019 13:26
simulating wind shear profile for a wind turbine--> How??? mohammad CFX 14 August 25, 2014 09:09
simulating wind shear profile for a wind turbine--> How??? mohammad FLUENT 0 April 14, 2012 23:54
Simulate the wind profile on a wind turbine---> HOW ???? mohammad Main CFD Forum 0 April 13, 2012 08:16
Simulate the wind profile on a wind turbine---> HOW ???? mohammad Main CFD Forum 0 April 13, 2012 08:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57.