CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Factors for the cubic inerpolation scheme in OpenFOAM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By sahas

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 10, 2017, 11:36
Post Factors for the cubic inerpolation scheme in OpenFOAM
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Hoshang is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I have a question regarding the used factors for the cubic interpolation scheme in OpenFOAM. Below you can see a part of the code for the cubic interpolation scheme:
Code:
virtual bool corrected() const
{
    return true;
}

//- Return the explicit correction to the face-interpolate
virtual tmp<GeometricField<Type, fvsPatchField, surfaceMesh>>
correction
(
     const GeometricField<Type, fvPatchField, volMesh>& vf
 ) const
{
       const fvMesh& mesh = this->mesh();

       // calculate the appropriate interpolation factors
       const surfaceScalarField& lambda = mesh.weights();

       const surfaceScalarField kSc
       (
                 lambda*(scalar(1) - lambda*(scalar(3) - scalar(2)*lambda))    
       );

       const surfaceScalarField kVecP(sqr(scalar(1) - lambda)*lambda);

       const surfaceScalarField kVecN(sqr(lambda)*(lambda - scalar(1)));

       tmp<GeometricField<Type, fvsPatchField, surfaceMesh>> tsfCorr
       (
             new GeometricField<Type, fvsPatchField, surfaceMesh>
             (
                    IOobject
                    (
                        "cubic::correction(" + vf.name() +')',
                        mesh.time().timeName(),
                        mesh,
                        IOobject::NO_READ,
                        IOobject::NO_WRITE,
                        false
                    ),
                    surfaceInterpolationScheme<Type>::interpolate(vf, kSc, -kSc)
             )
       );
       GeometricField<Type, fvsPatchField, surfaceMesh>& sfCorr = tsfCorr.ref();

       for (direction cmpt=0; cmpt<pTraits<Type>::nComponents;cmpt++)
       {
            sfCorr.replace
            (
                 cmpt,
                 sfCorr.component(cmpt)
             + (
                     surfaceInterpolationScheme
                     <
                          typename outerProduct
                          <
                                 vector,
                                 typename pTraits<Type>::cmptType
                          >::type
                      >::interpolate
                      (
                             fv::gaussGrad
                             <typename pTraits<Type>::cmptType>(mesh)
                            .grad(vf.component(cmpt)),
                             kVecP,
                             kVecN
                       ) & mesh.Sf()
                  )/mesh.magSf()/mesh.surfaceInterpolation::deltaCoeffs()
              );
         }
The cubic interpolation is done using the linear interpolated term plus a correction term which is defined above in the code. As I understand from the Code the correction uses the factor kSc for the owner point value and -kSc for the neighbor point value. In addition, the gradient of the owner point is added with the factor kVecP and the gradient of the neighbor point with the factor kVecN. With this we get for the value at the surface the following correlation:
phi_E=lambda*phi_P+(1-lambda)*phi_N+kSc*phi_P-kSc*phi_N+kVecP*gradPhi_P+kVecN*gradphi_N

Here phi_P and phi_N are the values at the owner and neighbor point and gradphi_P and gradphi_N the gradients at the mentioned points.
But by the use of a normal cubic polynomial function (f(x)=ax+bx+cx+d) for the interpolation of the surface value with given values and gradients for the owner and neighbor points as conditions I get another correlation with the defined factors in the above code:
phi_E=lambda*phi_P+(1-lambda)*phi_N-kSc*phi_P+kSc*phi_N-kVecN*gradPhi_P-kVecP*gradphi_N

The differences are the opposite signs and the exchange of the factors.
I have tried lot of other numerical interpolation ways to come on the same correlation as used in OpenFOAM but i wasnt sucessful till yet.
Does anyone knows how one gets the correlation which is used in OpenFOAM respectively which interpolation technique gives this correlation with the given values and gradients at the owner and neighbor point?

Thanks in advance for answers and hopefully someone can give me an advise regarding this problem.
Hoshang is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2017, 13:16
Default
  #2
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
sahas is on a distinguished road
I have no deep look into the problem but I am also interesting in that. When lambda is equal to 0.5 both formulas give the same result. Could you post your derivation of the formula please? Of course if it does not cause you any inconvenience
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2017, 08:26
Default Cubic scheme derivation
  #3
New Member
 
Yu Cheng
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
chengyu is on a distinguished road
Hey, guys. I have found the same problem as Hoshang met. I post my derivation of cubic interpolation here, if someone can find any errors, plz feel free to point out.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Given the value of the variable and its gradient at point P and N, assume a cubic polynomial variation in the section PN, derive the variable value at the face f.

\phi(x) = ax^3+bx^2+cx+d
\phi(x=0)=d=\phi_P
\phi'(x=0)=c=\nabla \phi_P
\phi(x=1)=a+b+c+d=\phi_N
\phi'(x=1)=3a+2b+c=\nabla \phi_N

thus a,b,c,d can be solved,

a=2\phi_P - 2\phi_N + \nabla \phi_P + \nabla \phi_N
b= -3\phi_P + 3\phi_N - 2\nabla \phi_P - \nabla \phi_N
c=\nabla \phi_P,\quad  d=\phi_P

then the variation of \phi in PN can be expressed as

\phi(x) = (2\phi_P - 2\phi_N + \nabla \phi_P + \nabla \phi_N)x^3+ (-3\phi_P + 3\phi_N - 2\nabla \phi_P - \nabla \phi_N)x^2 + \nabla \phi_P * x + \phi_P
\phi(x) = \phi_P(2x^3-3x^2+1) + \phi_N(-2x^3+3x^2) + \nabla \phi_P(x^3-2x^2+x) + \nabla \phi_N(x^3-x^2)
\phi_f = \phi(1-\lambda) = \lambda \phi_P + (1-\lambda)\phi_N + \lambda (1-\lambda)(1-2\lambda)(\phi_N -\phi_P) - \lambda^2(\lambda-1) \nabla \phi_P - \lambda (1-\lambda)^2 \nabla \phi_N
\phi_f = \phi_{f,linear} + kSc*\phi_N - kSc*\phi_P - kVecN*\nabla \phi_P - kVecP* \nabla \phi_N


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

The last equation is what exactly Hoshang gave, which is not the same implemented in OpenFOAM.

Best wishes
Yu Cheng

Last edited by chengyu; August 2, 2017 at 22:00. Reason: correct misprint term pointed out by Alexander
chengyu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2017, 10:54
Default
  #4
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
sahas is on a distinguished road
Hello, Yu Cheng!
I have checked your derivation and found it to be correct, except one misprint in the formula for \phi'(x=1): it should be equal to \nabla \phi_N.

I think one should report the bug (https://bugs.openfoam.org/bug_report_page.php).
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2017, 22:03
Default Change the mis-spelling
  #5
New Member
 
Yu Cheng
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
chengyu is on a distinguished road
Yes, you are right, I have changed the original formula, and I think I should better report this to the OpenFOAM official. Thank you.

Best wishes.

Yu Cheng
chengyu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2017, 12:37
Default
  #6
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
sahas is on a distinguished road
Bug report: https://bugs.openfoam.org/view.php?id=2650
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2017, 04:25
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Yu Cheng
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
chengyu is on a distinguished road
Hi Alexander,
Thank you for the report.

Best wishes,

Yu Cheng
chengyu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2017, 12:05
Default Gradients in cubic
  #8
lac
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
lac is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone!

This is my first post in this awsome forum. I hope this question would not be considered as off-topic, as it is related to the cubic scheme.
I started to use openFoam recently, and I'm sure, it is possible to find the answer from the code, but I can't.
Therefore I'd gratefull, if anyone could tell me how the gradients are calculated for the cubic scheme. I mean, are the schemes used from fvSchemes, or are they 'hard wired' in the code for this interpolation scheme.

Thanks in advance.
lac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2017, 15:20
Default
  #9
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
sahas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lac View Post
Therefore I'd gratefull, if anyone could tell me how the gradients are calculated for the cubic scheme. I mean, are the schemes used from fvSchemes, or are they 'hard wired' in the code for this interpolation scheme.
Hello!
The scheme for gradient evaluation is hard-coded for cubic interpolation and it is Gauss.
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2017, 04:58
Default
  #10
lac
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
lac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sahas View Post
Hello!
The scheme for gradient evaluation is hard-coded for cubic interpolation and it is Gauss.
Thank you. I guess it is linear then?

What do you think, is it possible to change it to fourth for instance?
Is it enough to modify the lines:
#include "gaussGrad.H" to #include "fourthGrad.H"
and
>::interpolate ( fv::gaussGrad
to
>::interpolate ( fv::fourthGrad

?

Or use some limiting somehow?
lac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2017, 17:54
Default
  #11
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
sahas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lac View Post
Thank you. I guess it is linear then?

What do you think, is it possible to change it to fourth for instance?
Is it enough to modify the lines:
#include "gaussGrad.H" to #include "fourthGrad.H"
and
>::interpolate ( fv::gaussGrad
to
>::interpolate ( fv::fourthGrad

?

Or use some limiting somehow?
I think it is possible and quite simple. I tried to change the scheme to leastSquares and I had no problems.
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2017, 07:33
Default
  #12
lac
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
lac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sahas View Post
I think it is possible and quite simple. I tried to change the scheme to leastSquares and I had no problems.
I also tried the leastSquares and it was easy. But the fourth is not working and I don't know how to limit the gradients.
lac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2017, 02:04
Default
  #13
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
sahas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lac View Post
I also tried the leastSquares and it was easy. But the fourth is not working and I don't know how to limit the gradients.
I don't look it in deep but I think that you may create your own scheme cubicGrad with runtime-selectable scheme for gradient as it is done for linearUpwind scheme.
lac likes this.
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 20, 2017, 04:08
Default
  #14
lac
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
lac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sahas View Post
I don't look it in deep but I think that you may create your own scheme cubicGrad with runtime-selectable scheme for gradient as it is done for linearUpwind scheme.
It's a good idea, although I don't know how to do it, yet. Anyway, thanks.
lac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2017, 05:19
Default
  #15
Super Moderator
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Augsburg
Posts: 2,595
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 47
Tobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Hi Sahas,

I read your bug report and the comments. Interesting fact. Right now I could imagine that if you have shock-wave propagation, the results might be different based on the gradients of neighbor/owner which are way much more pronounced in such cases than normal ones. Which cases did you check out for your report?
__________________
Keep foaming,
Tobias Holzmann
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2017, 05:51
Default
  #16
lac
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
lac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobi View Post
Hi Sahas,

I read your bug report and the comments. Interesting fact. Right now I could imagine that if you have shock-wave propagation, the results might be different based on the gradients of neighbor/owner which are way much more pronounced in such cases than normal ones. Which cases did you check out for your report?

I have also seen that report. However, I'm not completely sure about my derivation, but if you change how λ is defined above, from f(x=1-λ) to f(x=λ), the same coefficients as implemented in openFoam currently can be derived.
lac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2017, 06:52
Default
  #17
Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
sahas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobi View Post
Hi Sahas,

I read your bug report and the comments. Interesting fact. Right now I could imagine that if you have shock-wave propagation, the results might be different based on the gradients of neighbor/owner which are way much more pronounced in such cases than normal ones. Which cases did you check out for your report?
Hi, Tobi,

I have tried a simple unsteady case of 1D flow with sinusoidal varying velocity at inlet, using uniform and non-uniform grids. The difference between realizations of the cubic scheme is observed only on non-uniform grid and it is quite small (switching to linear or linearUpwind scheme has greater effect).
As for shock-wave case, due to the fact that cubic scheme is central scheme it would be hard to get non-oscillating solution for this case. And again, differences in realizations can be only seen on non-uniform grids, where other numerical errors begin to play the role.
To summarize, the current implementation gives small errors in a final solution. Perhaps, the effect is strong in the some cases of DNS of turbulence. But DNS is not very suitable to be a simple test case
sahas is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cubic, factors, interpolation, scheme, weights

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Map of the OpenFOAM Forum - Understanding where to post your questions! wyldckat OpenFOAM 10 September 2, 2021 06:29
Getting Started with OpenFOAM wyldckat OpenFOAM 24 October 2, 2019 22:35
Radiation With View Factors in OPENFOAM MadiS OpenFOAM 1 August 23, 2012 12:21
Second order upwinding scheme in OpenFoam subash OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 June 20, 2012 19:28
Surface interpolation scheme with tensors as weighting factors jutta OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 August 27, 2007 12:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31.