|
[Sponsors] |
August 3, 2019, 19:26 |
discrepancy in fvc::grad(U)
|
#1 |
Member
Anonymous
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 9 |
HI all,
Recently I noticed that in openfoam, gradient of a vector is computed as the outer product of the gradient operator and the vector. Page 25 (bottom) of the programmer's guide defines the gradient of velocity field as: which is transpose of what we exactly mean by grad(U) as: I checked the computed values of gradient of velocity field near the wall (where wall normal component is expected to be dominant) and I can confirm that it outputs the transpose of what we actually want. To my surprise, I have seen people use the grad(U) without taking its transpose in openfoam that would actually give the correct tensor. Has anybody encountered this issue before? OpenFOAM Version: 2.4.0 |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how can I do dot product of U and fvc::grad(U) where U is an volVectorFiled ? | mechy | OpenFOAM | 3 | February 24, 2023 11:17 |
Acoustic Power Discrepancy | Time4Tea | FLUENT | 0 | August 21, 2018 09:46 |
implicit - (fvc::grad(U) & fvc::grad(muEff)) | Kareem Abdelshafy | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | August 20, 2016 20:57 |
strange behaviour of fvc::grad(U) and NonlinearKEShih turbmod - analitical comparison | ancsa | OpenFOAM Verification & Validation | 1 | January 20, 2015 11:00 |
FLUENT Version Mis-Match Discrepancy | asd | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 19, 2007 04:58 |