CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Linear decay - implementation and convergence issues

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 15, 2021, 04:53
Default Linear decay - implementation and convergence issues
  #1
Member
 
Andrea Di Ronco
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Milano, Italy
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 9
Diro7 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

one of the custom solvers I'm working on features some simple steady-state transport equations of the form

\nabla \cdot (c \mathbf{u}) = \nabla (D \nabla c) - \lambda c + S

where \lambda is a uniform linear decay constant, D is an effective diffusivity which can depend on temperature and the flow field, and S is a volumetric source term which also has a complex dependence on other fields.

The equation is simply implemented as
Code:
fvScalarMatrix cEqn
(
    fvm::div(phi, c)
  - fvm::laplacian(D, c)
  + fvm::Sp(lambda, c)
 ==
    S
);
Things seem to work as they should. I've noticed that the convergence rate strongly depends on the magnitude of the decay parameter \lambda.
In particular, physical meaning (radioactive decay) imposes very small values (e.g. of the order of 1e-5/1e-8 s^-1), for which convergence is unacceptably slow.

I recognise this can be a reasonable behaviour, but I'd like to understand a little bit more.
In particular, from the implemented equation is clear (to me) that when all other quantities reach numerical convergence, the equation becomes fully implicit in c since coupling with other equations acts only in one way. The test cases are actually simple, with fully orthogonal meshes.

Shouldn't the equation be solved "exactly" when other fields become fixed after convergence?
Or is it maybe just a matter of how residuals are defined, and the fact that residuals take forever to lower doesn't affect the actual solution?

I feel like I'm missing something, so any suggestion would be greatly appreciated

Andrea
Diro7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Temperature convergence problem with nonsmooth thermal conductivity bmercer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 November 14, 2017 13:25
false time step implementation for steady state Kushagra CFX 1 June 22, 2008 19:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43.