
[Sponsors] 
March 5, 2013, 03:58 
Initial Residual for p too high!

#1 
Member
Nikesh Bhattarai
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sacheon, South Korea
Posts: 82
Rep Power: 13 
Hi all,
I am simulating a simple 2D flat plate flow in OpenFoam using simpleFOAM to validate a new turbulence model that I would like to implement here. This new turbulence model is a slight modification of the kOmegaSST model which includes few new terms into the nut equation. Results from kOmegaSST model are all OK! However, when I use this new model for the same grid, my initial pressure residuals oscillate around a pretty high value, at around 0.03 while the initial U,k and omega residuals are all at a reasonable convergence criterion, at around 10^5. This is not making much sense to me. Because, after some iterations(about 6~7,000) when I extract the results (even without reaching the convergence tolerance) and compare, they don't yet seem so weird or deviating highly from that of the SST's results. I have checked my code numerous times, doesn't seem to have any problems in there. Could there be a problem with the solvers I chose? I am as well wondering how the presidual is calculated in simpleFOAM. I would highly appreciate any insights into this! Thanks! Nikesh These are my settings and I've used the same for kOmegaSST (in the pic attached). 

March 5, 2013, 04:17 

#2 
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26 
hi
Test for one or two order lower p tolernces than U,... 1e9 or 1e10 

March 5, 2013, 05:23 

#3 
Member
Nikesh Bhattarai
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sacheon, South Korea
Posts: 82
Rep Power: 13 
Thanks!
Tried, yet not much of a difference. 

March 9, 2013, 15:51 

#4 
Member
AndreiCFD
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 13 
Hi
Basically I am having the same problem.... I just want to ask you if you managed to do it in the end. I am simulating the flow over an aerofoil using k omega sst and simpleFoam with wall functions.......... Have you got any ideas? Thanks Andrei 

March 10, 2013, 00:35 

#5 
Member
Nikesh Bhattarai
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sacheon, South Korea
Posts: 82
Rep Power: 13 
Hii Andrei,
Well, I am still stuck with the same problem. Obviously higher presidual means mass is not being conserved so well somewhere in the cells. You might want to look into your boundary conditions once more. Basically that is what I am trying to do too. And the schemes and type of mesh you are using for airfoil flow. 

March 10, 2013, 06:28 

#6 
Member
AndreiCFD
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 13 
Hi
Ok I understand . I am using k omega sst , wall functions and simpleFoam solver ..... I have changed my boundary conditions many times still nothing......for example how you o file looks like and something that I don't understand : how do you calculate the turbulent kinetic energy K and the rate of dissipation W(omega)....... thanks Andrei 

March 10, 2013, 09:56 

#7 
Senior Member
Daniel P. Combest
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: St. Louis, USA
Posts: 621
Rep Power: 0 
Nick,
There are some strategies that I would try to get these residuals down to something you would like.
There are a lot of other strategies that you can try, but this one might be sufficient. Without knowing more details like divergence schemes; mesh structure and checkmesh results; y+ values; and boundary conditions there is not much to add on my part. I would look at the thread http://www.cfdonline.com/Forums/ope...problems.html and then move on to a search of the forum. There are many threads about simpleFoam convergence...but my list of threads is not in front of me right now. good luck. Last edited by chegdan; March 10, 2013 at 18:01. Reason: spelling 

March 15, 2013, 04:17 

#8 
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26 
how can decrease the initial residuals for p in unsteady problems when relaxations are not applicable?


May 25, 2017, 02:52 

#9 
New Member
Thodoris
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Greece
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 10 
Hello guys,
I am running a simulation of a flow over two wings. My simulation is 3d.I check the mesh and there is no error. I am using freestream bc and wall functions. Solver is simplefoam and turbulence model spalart almaras dudes. The problem is when I ran with coarse mesh the solution converge but when I ran with finer mesh the pressure residuals don't fall under 10^5 they stop at about 2*10^4.I used snappyhexmesh for the mesh. Any advice would be useful thank you in advance. Thodoris 

May 25, 2017, 03:58 

#10  
Member
AndreiCFD
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 13 
Quote:


May 25, 2017, 17:40 

#11 
New Member
Thodoris
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Greece
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 10 
Andrei,
Thank you a lot for your answer.I am trying to calculate the cl, cd but i am having troubles because of my geometry, which consists two wings in the same but opposite angle of attack (+ 8 degrees) so i am having problems with the normals. I hope you have an idea to face this problem.I am attaching my geometry. Thank you very much in advance. 

May 26, 2017, 06:53 

#12  
Member
AndreiCFD
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 13 
Quote:
Cheers 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Moving mesh  Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom)  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  122  June 15, 2014 06:20 
pimpleFoam: turbulence>correct(); is not executed when using residualControl  hfs  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  3  October 29, 2013 08:35 
SLTS+rhoPisoFoam: what is rDeltaT???  nileshjrane  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  4  February 25, 2013 04:13 
pisoFoam with kepsilon turb blows up  Some questions  Heroic  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  26  December 17, 2012 03:34 
Convergence moving mesh  lr103476  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  30  November 19, 2007 14:09 