CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Semi-implicit MULES with LES (OF v2.3.0) ?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 19, 2014, 12:50
Default Semi-implicit MULES with LES (OF v2.3.0) ?
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 15
smschnob is on a distinguished road
Greetings,

I noticed that OF v2.3.0 has a new semi-implicit variant of MULES, which to my understanding allows for larger Courant numbers. Can this be used with LES turbulence model, which in my experience has required a maxCo < 1 in order to accurately resolve turbulent scales. In other words, if I use semi-implicit MULES and allow for a larger Courant number, would I still be able to accurately simulate turbulence? Anyone have any experience with this? Thanks!

Best Regards,

S.
smschnob is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem of simulating of small droplet with radius of 2mm liguifan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 June 3, 2014 02:53
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour. sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 January 2, 2013 22:40
Is it feasible to apply implicit scheme in LES EagleGao Main CFD Forum 2 October 24, 2011 14:04
Differences between serial and parallel runs carsten OpenFOAM Bugs 11 September 12, 2008 11:16
Komogrov time scale and implicit scheme for LES Li Yang Main CFD Forum 1 January 17, 2004 01:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31.