|
[Sponsors] | |||||
CrankNicolson discretization and Courant number |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 150
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
in book it's written that CrankNicolson method is unconditionally stable.
But using this method in icoFoam solver my solution after ~100 iterations explodes... Courant number is >60 at start and increasing (because I have an increasing transient inlet velocity). Yes, Courant number is big, but as I said before CrankNicolson method is unconditionally stable.. So what a problem with simulation ?? Maybe someone got such problem before. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Hi,
For what type of equations it is unconditionally stable (see the book)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 150
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
According to "Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics" 2nd edition" it is written "...schemes with – 1 2 ≤ θ ≤ 1, including the Crank–Nicolson scheme, are unconditionally stable for all values of the time step" ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Jianrui Zeng
Join Date: May 2018
Location: China
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
I am still confused about the instability of CrankNicolson 0.9. Any suggestion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| crank-nicolson, icofoam, openfoam 2.3.0 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Running stably with a large Courant number using pimpleFoam | mlawson | OpenFOAM | 11 | November 29, 2014 11:37 |
| should Courant number always be kept below 1? | wc34071209 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | March 9, 2014 20:31 |
| OpenFOAM, Courant number and implicit methods | fsaltara | OpenFOAM | 8 | December 28, 2012 05:16 |
| ddt explicit or implicit with courant number!! | mrshb4 | OpenFOAM | 0 | December 13, 2010 12:13 |
| Courant number | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | May 29, 2006 18:20 |