chtMultiRegionFoam is slower in parallel than serial

froberto · September 11, 2023, 15:41

Hi All,
I am trying to run a multi region case in parallel.
However, it runs slower in parallel than serial.
So, I went back to the tutorial case multiRegionHeater (within heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam) and I ran it both in serial and parallel.
The parallel run is slower than the serial run.
I have also tried other tutorial cases with buoyantPimpleFoam and solidFoam and I was able to run them in parallel, and their performance is better than the serial run's.
Anyone any ideas?
How can I make chtMultiRegionFoam run faster in parallel.

Thanks,
Roberto

P.S. I am using OpenFoam-v2012.

dlahaye · September 11, 2023, 16:27

For small cases (small number of cells) communication (between processors) might (emphasis on might) dominate computations (on each processor).

froberto · September 12, 2023, 13:55

Thanks dlahaye for your response.
You are right.
I have increased the number of volumes in the tutorial example, and now the parallel case runs faster than the serial.
Thanks for the help!

September 11, 2023, 15:41	chtMultiRegionFoam is slower in parallel than serial	#1
froberto New Member Roberto Join Date: Jul 2021 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 4	Hi All, I am trying to run a multi region case in parallel. However, it runs slower in parallel than serial. So, I went back to the tutorial case multiRegionHeater (within heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam) and I ran it both in serial and parallel. The parallel run is slower than the serial run. I have also tried other tutorial cases with buoyantPimpleFoam and solidFoam and I was able to run them in parallel, and their performance is better than the serial run's. Anyone any ideas? How can I make chtMultiRegionFoam run faster in parallel. Thanks, Roberto P.S. I am using OpenFoam-v2012.

September 11, 2023, 16:27		#2
dlahaye Senior Member Domenico Lahaye Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 723 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 17	For small cases (small number of cells) communication (between processors) might (emphasis on might) dominate computations (on each processor). froberto likes this.

September 12, 2023, 13:55		#3
froberto New Member Roberto Join Date: Jul 2021 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 4	Thanks dlahaye for your response. You are right. I have increased the number of volumes in the tutorial example, and now the parallel case runs faster than the serial. Thanks for the help! dlahaye likes this.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
different results between serial solver and parallel solver	wlt_1985	FLUENT	11	October 12, 2018 08:23
Error running openfoam in parallel	fede32	OpenFOAM Programming & Development	5	October 4, 2018 16:38
To continue from latestTime of a previous serial run in parallel	redbullah	OpenFOAM	2	July 26, 2018 14:01
Parallel vs Serial Run-Solver manager	rohit_turbo	CFX	5	March 4, 2016 08:34
MPI slower than serial	LucaFen	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	0	November 24, 2015 06:08