|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Jean bon
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Hi,
I saw that there is an option for thermocouple correction in OpenFOAMv16+: http://www.openfoam.com/version-v161...g-thermocouple I am not sure it is correct for the radiation. According to the code, the balance equation for radiation is emissivity*(G-sigma*T⁴). I do not think it is correct because G is not Qin. For a boundary condition at a wall, we use Marshak boundary conditions: ![]() I would think that we have to use it instead of the simple form that is used in openfoam v16+. I have not got the same result when I change it. Which one is correct ? Thanks for your response. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Dennis
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
do you used the function object thermocouple?
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Floating point exception error | Alan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | July 1, 2021 22:51 |
| SIMPLE algorithm does not converge when using old pressure (correction) values | andreasp | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 9, 2016 22:18 |
| Production correction or curvature correction in the SST model | Ang | CFX | 2 | May 20, 2014 21:50 |
| Star ccm 9.02 - unsteady flux dissipation correction | fivos | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | April 28, 2014 10:37 |
| Pressure correction problem | richard_larson | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | October 30, 2008 09:48 |