CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

dirvergence of simulations after resuming pimpleDyMFoam with latestTime

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 29, 2017, 09:06
Question dirvergence of simulations after resuming pimpleDyMFoam with latestTime
  #1
Senior Member
 
Robert Castilla
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 17
rcastilla is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am doing a very large simulation with pimpleDyMFoam. The simulation has to stop after some time and then it is resumed with startFrom=latestTime. The odd behaviour is that the residuals (specially for cellMotionU) are much bigger for the same time after resuming than in the original simulation. The consequence is that pressure rises and finally simulation diverges and crashes.

I wonder if this behaviour is normal, or I am missing something important, and how can it be avoided. Has the previous timestep mesh velocity to be stored as it happens with U (U0)?

Just for the sake of illustration, these are the residuals for the first simulation:

Code:
DICPCG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 3.014665e-05, Final residual = 7.21103e-06, No Iterations 1
DICPCG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 2.564917e-05, Final residual = 6.150698e-06, No Iterations 1
DICPCG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 5.70637e-05, Final residual = 9.442849e-06, No Iterations 3
AMI: Creating addressing and weights between 735136 source faces and 142500 target faces
AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min/max/average = 0.999999, 1.284449, 1.000723
AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min/max/average = 0, 1.000187, 0.1921055
AMI: Creating addressing and weights between 12818 source faces and 142500 target faces
AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min/max/average = 0.999999, 1.000001, 1
AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min/max/average = 0, 1.00001, 0.09399662
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.70526e-06, No Iterations 34
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 0.007424773, Final residual = 9.022955e-06, No Iterations 7
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 0.0007156682, Final residual = 7.523588e-06, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 0.0001249183, Final residual = 8.536026e-06, No Iterations 2
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.287284e-11, global = -4.058237e-14, cumulative = 2.063061e-08
PIMPLE: iteration 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.000446605, Final residual = 2.503277e-06, No Iterations 2
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.0003534157, Final residual = 1.543715e-06, No Iterations 2
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.0002096194, Final residual = 3.72596e-06, No Iterations 1
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.01010752, Final residual = 4.525623e-06, No Iterations 15
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0008452819, Final residual = 6.474103e-06, No Iterations 4
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0001524509, Final residual = 6.10551e-06, No Iterations 2
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 3.652736e-05, Final residual = 6.288872e-06, No Iterations 1
...
And this is for the same timestep, but after resuming (same time, same deltaTime)

Code:
DICPCG:  Solving for cellMotionUx, Initial residual = 0.9875883, Final residual = 9.365624e-06, No Iterations 45
DICPCG:  Solving for cellMotionUy, Initial residual = 0.8734927, Final residual = 8.890372e-06, No Iterations 45
DICPCG:  Solving for cellMotionUz, Initial residual = 0.8945875, Final residual = 9.334527e-06, No Iterations 42
AMI: Creating addressing and weights between 735136 source faces and 142500 target faces
AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min/max/average = 0.999999, 1.284449, 1.000723
AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min/max/average = 0, 1.000187, 0.1921055
AMI: Creating addressing and weights between 12818 source faces and 142500 target faces
AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min/max/average = 0.999999, 1.000001, 1
AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min/max/average = 0, 1.00001, 0.09399653
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 8.244299e-06, No Iterations 36
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 0.004357187, Final residual = 8.350664e-06, No Iterations 6
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 0.0003333046, Final residual = 7.19278e-06, No Iterations 3
GAMG:  Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 5.795673e-05, Final residual = 4.281988e-06, No Iterations 2
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.799065e-11, global = 1.149708e-13, cumulative = 1.149708e-13
PIMPLE: iteration 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.007882085, Final residual = 1.447875e-06, No Iterations 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00347453, Final residual = 7.595343e-07, No Iterations 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.05136888, Final residual = 8.64171e-06, No Iterations 1
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.01248666, Final residual = 5.58013e-06, No Iterations 27
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.002796536, Final residual = 5.829347e-06, No Iterations 25
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.001070345, Final residual = 8.3443e-06, No Iterations 19
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0004921974, Final residual = 8.892418e-06, No Iterations 18
...
Hope somebody knows the answer to this mistery (at least for me).

With best regards

Robert
rcastilla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2017, 08:26
Default
  #2
New Member
 
JD
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
dickcruz is on a distinguished road
Hey Robert,

Did you run the simulation in parallel?
dickcruz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2017, 08:41
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Robert Castilla
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 17
rcastilla is on a distinguished road
Hi, dickcruz,

Yes. Do you think it has something to do?

Robert
rcastilla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2017, 09:01
Default
  #4
New Member
 
JD
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
dickcruz is on a distinguished road
Well, it may not be the issue, but you might want to check that you're actually copying the latest timestep into your processor directories.
dickcruz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
latesttime, pimpledymfoam, residuals


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D simulations OpenFoam running too low(more 1 000 000 elements) Suggestion speed up? silvai OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 April 6, 2017 11:44
pimpleDyMFoam won't restart from latestTime xixchubbsxix OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 September 30, 2015 05:26
Savonius pimpleDyMFoam vitokad OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 10 September 16, 2014 09:30
parallel error with cyclic BCs for pimpleDyMFoam and trouble in resuming running sunliming OpenFOAM Bugs 21 November 22, 2013 03:38
Hardware selection for steady/unsteady incompressible, turbulent and cht simulations maddalena OpenFOAM 2 July 13, 2011 08:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:58.