CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

port flow analysis in internal combustion engine , rhosimpleFoam NOT converging

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 3, 2017, 09:15
Default port flow analysis in internal combustion engine , rhosimpleFoam NOT converging
  #1
Member
 
giovanni
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 8
gian93 is on a distinguished road
Hi guys.
I'm a student and i' m new in open foam simulation..
I' m trying to evaluate the flow coefficient through a poppet valve of an internal comb. engine .
I have modeled my geometry by solidworks providing a semi sphere as a rest chamber before the main inlet duct and then a another "plenum" behind the cylinder and then a another "plenum" behind the cylinder displacement (having cylindrical shape too).
the solver that i must use is rhosimpleFoam since my case is stationary , compressible.

I' ve made two type of simulation.
1) First of all i' ve tried to impose a pressure drop between inlet (semi sphere) and outlet
2) then i change the bc by imposing a mass flow rate instead of a pressure drop .

In both case i cannot reach convergence . it seems that some heavy unsteady phenomena arouse (especially around the poppet valve) that prevent the case to reach a convergent solution.

CheckMesh seems ok and not give me any warning...

I' ve try a lot of configuration : only laminar flow (instead of k-omega turbulence model) , larger cell of blockMesh ecc, larger plenum chamber at outlet .. but nothing seems work.

i' ve stayed on ths project for weeks and weeks but i didn't managed to reach any type of solution.
Could anyone help me by take a look on the case? i' ve uploaded the case via google drive at this link.




https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_R...ew?usp=sharing







here instead i give checkMesh log:



Create time

Create polyMesh for time = 0

Time = 0

Mesh stats
points: 4272659
faces: 12025709
internal faces: 11751182
cells: 3903207
faces per cell: 6.09163
boundary patches: 10
point zones: 1
face zones: 3
cell zones: 0

Overall number of cells of each type:
hexahedra: 3512127
prisms: 47047
wedges: 0
pyramids: 0
tet wedges: 752
tetrahedra: 3
polyhedra: 343278
Breakdown of polyhedra by number of faces:
faces number of cells
4 51944
5 28009
6 29925
7 113169
8 53725
9 38062
10 970
11 298
12 15864
13 53
14 61
15 10827
16 6
17 1
18 363
21 1

Checking topology...
Boundary definition OK.
Cell to face addressing OK.
Point usage OK.
Upper triangular ordering OK.
Face vertices OK.
Number of regions: 1 (OK).

Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces...
Patch Faces Points Surface topology
inlet 56952 71836 ok (non-closed singly connected)
piatto 9949 11307 ok (non-closed singly connected)
condotto 79887 104802 ok (non-closed singly connected)
guida 4326 5685 ok (non-closed singly connected)
valvole 57033 64591 ok (non-closed singly connected)
sedi 11158 15191 ok (non-closed singly connected)
testa 26416 29430 ok (non-closed singly connected)
outlet 1581 1613 ok (non-closed singly connected)
cilindro 17224 18461 ok (non-closed singly connected)
plenum 10001 10123 ok (non-closed singly connected)

Checking geometry...
Overall domain bounding box (0.0367242 -0.18 0.346475) (0.236754 0.323378 0.628011)
Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1)
Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1)
Boundary openness (-3.22993e-16 -1.18435e-16 4.97165e-16) OK.
Max cell openness = 4.30493e-16 OK.
Max aspect ratio = 13.9639 OK.
Minimum face area = 2.01645e-09. Maximum face area = 6.50251e-06. Face area magnitudes OK.
Min volume = 4.14004e-13. Max volume = 1.05867e-08. Total volume = 0.00404849. Cell volumes OK.
Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 64.9158 average: 6.94015
Non-orthogonality check OK.
Face pyramids OK.
Max skewness = 3.80401 OK.
Coupled point location match (average 0) OK.

Mesh OK.

End
gian93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2017, 03:36
Default
  #2
Member
 
giovanni
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 8
gian93 is on a distinguished road
i post here some issue
i know that the case is very heavy..


control dict
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location "system";
object controlDict;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

application rhoSimpleFoam;

startFrom startTime;

startTime 0;

stopAt endTime;

endTime 2500;

deltaT 1;

writeControl timeStep;

writeInterval 100;

purgeWrite 0;

writeFormat ascii;

writePrecision 6;

writeCompression off;

timeFormat general;

timePrecision 6;

graphFormat raw;

runTimeModifiable true;

functions
{

#includeFunc "residuals"
// #includeFunc "volFlowRateSurface"
// #includeFunc "pressureDifferencePatch"
//#includeFunc "staticPressure"
//#includeFunc "totalPressureCompressible"
#includeFunc "yPlus"

}


Fvschemes

FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location "system";
object fvSchemes;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

ddtSchemes
{
default steadyState;
}

gradSchemes
{
default Gauss linear;
}

divSchemes
{
default none;

div(phi,U) bounded Gauss linear;
div(((rho*nuEff)*dev2(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear;
div(phi,e) bounded Gauss upwind;
div(phi,h) bounded Gauss upwind;
div(phi,epsilon) bounded Gauss upwind;
div(phi,omega) bounded Gauss upwind;
div(phi,k) bounded Gauss upwind;

div(phid,p) Gauss upwind;
div(phi,Ekp) bounded Gauss upwind;
div((phi|interpolate(rho)),p) Gauss upwind;
div(phi,K) bounded Gauss upwind;
}

laplacianSchemes
{
default Gauss linear corrected;
//default Gauss linear uncorrected;
}

interpolationSchemes
{
default linear;
}

snGradSchemes
{
default corrected;
}

wallDist
{
method meshWave;
}






FvSolution

FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location "system";
object fvSolution;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

solvers
{
p
{
solver GAMG;
tolerance 1e-08;
relTol 0.1;
smoother GaussSeidel;
nPreSweeps 0;
nPostSweeps 2;
nFinestSweeps 2;
cacheAgglomeration true;
nCellsInCoarsestLevel 20;
agglomerator faceAreaPair;
mergeLevels 1;
}

U
{
solver PBiCGStab;
preconditioner DILU;

nSweeps 2;
tolerance 1e-06;
relTol 0.1;
}

"(e|h)"
{
solver PBiCGStab;
preconditioner DILU;

tolerance 1e-06;
relTol 0.1;
}

"(k|epsilon|omega)"
{
$U;
tolerance 1e-07;
relTol 0.1;
}
}

SIMPLE
{
nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0;
rhoMin 0.1;
rhoMax 1.5;
pRefCell 0;
pRefValue 0;
residualControl
{
p 1e-4;
U 1e-4;
e 1e-4;

// possibly check turbulence fields
"(k|epsilon|omega)" 1e-3;
}
}

relaxationFactors
{
fields
{
p 0.5;
rho 0.05;
}
equations
{
U 0.7;
"(k|epsilon|omega)" 0.7;
"(e|h)" 0.5;
}
}
gian93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2017, 03:38
Default
  #3
Member
 
giovanni
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 8
gian93 is on a distinguished road
here instead the boundary conditionv(only P and U for the case with imposed pressure difference)



/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |
| \\ / O peration | Version: 5.0 |
| \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org |
| \\/ M anipulation | |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volScalarField;
location "0";
object p;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform 101500;

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type totalPressure;
U U;
gamma 1.4;
p0 uniform 101500;
value uniform 101500;
}
piatto
{
type zeroGradient;
}
condotto
{
type zeroGradient;
}
guida
{
type zeroGradient;
}
valvole
{
type zeroGradient;
}
sedi
{
type zeroGradient;
}
testa
{
type zeroGradient;
}
outlet
{
type uniformFixedValue;
uniformValue table
(
(0 101500)
(50 101000)
(100 100500)
(150 100000)
(200 99500)
//(50 99000)
//(60 98500)
//(70 98000)
//(80 97500)
//(90 97000)
//(100 96500)
//(110 96000)
//(120 (90000))
//(130 (85000))
//(140 (81500))
);
}
cilindro
{
type zeroGradient;
}
plenum
{
type zeroGradient;
}
}


// ************************************************** *********************** //







/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |
| \\ / O peration | Version: 5.0 |
| \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org |
| \\/ M anipulation | |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volVectorField;
location "0";
object U;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform (0 0 0);

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type pressureInletOutletVelocity;
value uniform (0 0 0);
U U;
}
piatto
{
type noSlip;
}
condotto
{
type noSlip;

}
guida
{
type noSlip;
}
valvole
{
type noSlip;
}
sedi
{
type noSlip;
}
testa
{
type noSlip;
}
outlet
{
type pressureNormalInletOutletVelocity;
value uniform (0 0 0);
phi phi;
}
cilindro
{
type noSlip;
}
plenum
{
type noSlip;
}
}


// ************************************************** *********************** //
gian93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2017, 02:55
Default
  #4
Member
 
giovanni
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 8
gian93 is on a distinguished road
hi!
could anyone help me?


should i use a unsteady solver?

maybe you can give me some input.
thanks.
gian93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error msg: In Analysis 'Flow Analysis 1': No domains have been defined. spwater CFX 9 October 11, 2022 22:00
compressible flow calculation error using rhoSimpleFoam solver student4326 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 November 2, 2015 11:34
Difference in flow distribution of single phase and multiphase analysis shivasluzz CFX 0 April 22, 2015 22:54
Compressible flow analysis Sonu Siemens 3 December 5, 2007 07:25
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:36.