|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
A. Min
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 309
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hi all
according to Verstig CFD book (and also Patankar) I want to see the effect of the discretization scheme on the results (especially diffusion error in upwind scheme and unboundedness in central scheme). For this purpose I want to solve the equation of T like: div (phi , T) = 0 (diffusion term should be removed (to see numerical diffusion)) beside the continuity and momentum eqn. in a steady state mood with openfoam(where phi is the flux). I have gotten the result by Upwind scheme, but unfortunately I can't solve the eqn. with central scheme! my solution become diverge. Do you know why? I want to compare the result of two schemes. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| central, discretization, openfoam, unboundedness, upwind |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Temporal discretization Scheme CoEuler | vsammartano | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 12, 2016 08:06 |
| Discretization Scheme | dinesh | FLUENT | 0 | August 31, 2013 05:52 |
| Time discretization scheme | HaKu | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 12, 2011 03:06 |
| Drag comparison upwind vs. scheme | Luk_Fiz | CFX | 3 | April 27, 2009 22:42 |
| MARS discretization scheme | raymond | Siemens | 3 | February 1, 2002 06:33 |