 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
September 8, 2018, 18:46
|
slip or noslip U BC in openfoam?
|
#1 |
|
Member
Federico Agustín Caccia
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 10  |
I'm modeling head loss in a pipe using openfoam. I'm using k-epsilon turbulence model. Since I don't want to model the viscous layer, I'm using wall law, for k and epsilon (so I use kqRWallFunction and epsilonWallFunction). Should I use slip or noSlip BC for U on walls? (I know from the theory we should apply a tangential stress to U instead of a fixed 0 value, but I don't know how it's implemented on OpenFoam).
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| head loss, kepsilon, pipe, slip, wall law |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UNIGE February 13th-17th - 2107. OpenFOAM advaced training days | joegi.geo | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 0 | October 1, 2016 19:20 |
| slip & noslip boundary conditions are wrong on dynamic mesh | oschi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | February 18, 2016 12:52 |
| Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
| can slip boundary condition in openFoam mean "inviscid wall" ? | s.m | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 2 | October 11, 2013 13:27 |
| The OpenFOAM extensions project | mbeaudoin | OpenFOAM | 16 | October 9, 2007 09:33 |
12Likes
Threaded Mode
