|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between kEqn and one equation eddy viscosity model for LES simulations |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 11, 2020, 10:08 |
Difference between kEqn and one equation eddy viscosity model for LES simulations
|
#1 |
Senior Member
chandra shekhar pant
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear FOAMERS,
I was reading a research article, and in that article it was mentioned that they used "one equation eddy viscosity model (OEEVM)", I checked the tutorials for this model but could not get some thing similar. I started searching some platform and found that "kEqn" is actually "one equation eddy viscosity model (OEEVM)". Is it true? Any suggestion will be great help to me. |
|
May 11, 2020, 16:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 494
Rep Power: 14 |
Yes, this is true to my knowledge -- just a product of naming change with OpenFOAM version. The kEqn model uses one equation for sgs turbulent kinetic energy transport and is a "one equation" model.
Eg. from OpenFOAM 2.4.x : Code:
void oneEqEddy::updateSubGridScaleFields() { muSgs_ = ck_*rho()*sqrt(k_)*delta(); } Code:
void kEqn<BasicTurbulenceModel>::correctNut() { this->nut_ = Ck_*sqrt(k_)*this->delta(); } Caelan |
|
May 12, 2020, 01:19 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
chandra shekhar pant
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks a lot Caelan for your kind help and clarification. So every thing will be identical I guess in terms of BC for the variables etc? Thanks again
|
|
May 12, 2020, 10:57 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 494
Rep Power: 14 |
They likely will. Like I said, the turbulence modeling framework has changed a bit between versions (i.e. muSgs to nut) so required SGS variables will change a bit. You could figure out the differences by looking at tutorials from old and new openfoam releases.
Caelan |
|
May 17, 2020, 01:18 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
chandra shekhar pant
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks for your clarification, unfortunately, I have only OpenFOAM 1906 and don't have an access to other versions. But if I say that I am trying to replicate the results of the paper (which uses one equation eddy viscosity model) using the KEqn model then am I correct to say that I am using the same model as that been used by the paper? Does that make sense?
|
|
May 17, 2020, 01:31 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 494
Rep Power: 14 |
The code for older versions is always accessible, even if you don't use it -- just google for the repository. Yes it should be the same model.
Caelan |
|
May 17, 2020, 01:40 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
chandra shekhar pant
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks a lot Caelan for your wonderful help and support.
|
|
|
|